
Audio By Carbonatix
The Supreme Court will today give its verdict on the contempt of court charges levelled against former Deputy Attorney General, Dr Dominic Ayine.
This follows an order by the court to the member of the legal team of the petitioner in the ongoing 2020 election petition, to publicly apologise for some scandalous remark he made against the court.
At a press briefing on Tuesday, February 16, Dr Ayine had accused the Court panel of having a pre-determined agenda to rule against the 2020 NDC presidential candidate, John Mahama.
Dr Ayine who was unhappy after the panel in a unanimous decision dismissed an application by Mr Mahama to reopen his case, said he was surprised the panel is trying to expunge four of the five issues raised by the petitioner.
“These are all germane issues under the constitution and laws of Ghana and to reduce the petition into a single issue petition is rather unfortunate and smacks of a predetermined agenda to rule against the petitioner in this matter,” the Bolga East MP said.
But admitting his error before the Justices of the Supreme Court on February 22, Dr. Ayine said he has submitted a letter indicating his remorse and a retraction of the statement.
The Chief Justice, Anin Yeboah subsequently ordered Dr. Ayine to render the apology through the same medium used to sacandalise the court before Thursday, February 25, 2021.
“We accept the apology of the counsel for the contemnor, but we however order that the contemnor purges his contempt by retracting the scandalous statements on the very same medium before Thursday, February 25, 2021, when the court will reconvene to hear the contempt case,” Chief Justice Anin-Yeboah said.
Obeying the orders by the court, Dr. Ayine speaking to the media, explained that it was not his intention to scandalise the court.
According to him, he always tried to address the media after a hearing without seeking to attribute acts of impropriety to the Supreme Court.
“But on hindsight, I actually crossed the line in suggesting that the court had a predetermined agenda among others to rule against the petitioner.”
“My attention was drawn to this fact immediately after the press briefing by Frank Davies, to whom I am grateful.
“I wish to unreservedly apologise to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Ghana as well as the justices who sat on that day.”
Dr Ayine also retracted the words he used while addressing the press in their entirety stating that “there was no intention on my part to impugn their integrity.”
“I am hoping that my apology and retraction will be accepted by Their Lordships and the matter will come to an end,” he concluded.
At today's hearing, the Chief Justice, Anin-Yeboah will determine whether the charges would be struck out or the former Deputy Attorney General should be punished.
Latest Stories
-
Advance ruling to give importers certainty before goods arrive – GRA
5 minutes -
VIDEO: Tension at High Court as lawyer escapes arrest attempt by suspected security operatives
6 minutes -
Photos: Parliamentary committee assesses recycling plant at Yabram in Dambai
11 minutes -
King Promise named brand ambassador for Dierre Ghana campaign
11 minutes -
Ghana must fund large-scale farms to drive industrialisation – Kojo Akoto Boateng
12 minutes -
Zanetor urges CSIR to turn research into commercial solutions
14 minutes -
President Mahama, Ato Forson clear path for Ghana’s US$9bn agro-industrial potential
15 minutes -
Poor standard morgue facilities shut down in Ashanti Region
16 minutes -
They came to UENR for a degree, they are leaving with skills for the real world
18 minutes -
AFCON 2027Q: ‘Semenyo’s leg is swollen’ – Kurt Okraku
22 minutes -
E.P. Church honours former GOIL CEO, Togbe Adza Nye IV for his philanthropy
22 minutes -
EducationUSA College Fair 2026 to offer Ghanaian students first-hand guide to U.S university admissions
34 minutes -
PBL welcomes new UCC Vice Chancellor, strengthening lasting partnership
42 minutes -
Global pressures weigh on cedi as US dollar strengthens – BoG
43 minutes -
BoG flags external-sector pressures ahead of MPC decision
51 minutes