Audio By Carbonatix
Information Minister, Kojo Oppong Nkrumah has said that he cannot confirm if ‘galamsey’ kingpin, Aisha Huang, was escorted while being repatriated to China four years ago.
The Ofoase-Ayirebi lawmaker while confirming in an interview on Joy FM's Newsnight that Aisha Huang, was indeed repatriated to her country, said he currently “has no brief” which suggests that there was an escort on that journey.
The MP, nonetheless, indicated that his brief gives credence to the fact that Aisha Huang was sent back to her country.
“In the brief I have, those particulars are not available, I am not saying they are not available but in the brief I have, they are not.
“The brief I have gives me details of the flight, when it left Accra, when it got to its destination through transit to China with her aboard. That is the brief I have, that is the brief I will share with you and you can validate…in the brief I have, I do not have answers to questions about, was she escorted? How many people escorted her?,” he told Evans Mensah on Newsnight, Tuesday.
On September 12, 2022, the Ranking Member on Foreign Affairs Committee in Parliament alleged that ‘galamsey’ kingpin, Aisha Huang had no escort when she was deported in 2018.
Mr. Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa said Aisha Huang’s deportation was only a “shambolic attempt of a deportation” and a “charade” by the government.
Speaking on Top Story, Monday, he noted that due to the awkward manner of Aisha Huang’s deportation, the ‘galamsey’ kingpin could have absconded during her transit to China.
“This whole charade of deportation has gone down as the most shambolic attempted deportation ever in world affairs. Do you know that this deportation took place without an escort? There was no escort…She could have really absconded when they transited in Addis Ababa,” he said.
Meanwhile, speaking in the same interview, Mr. Kojo Oppong Nkrumah also clarified President Akufo-Addo’s comment about his uncertainty regarding how ‘galamsey’ kingpin, Aisha Huang, exited the country in 2018.
He said the President’s comment was a direct response to the particular question he was asked.
“The President was not speaking in a vacuum. There was a question about deportation and the President proceeded to respond that he is not too sure whether it is about deportation or whether she fled but then the substantive thing is this and then he proceeded to provide the substantive answer.
“I have heard several commentators suggest that there should have been more clarity in the President’s words etc. I mean in a democracy I am sure that we can always raise questions about the choice of words,” he explained on Tuesday.
Latest Stories
-
Friends of Bridget Bonnie Marks her 35th birthday with donation to Kasseh Model Health Centre
10 minutes -
Landfilling waste management creates no value, it’s an economic waste
37 minutes -
Photos: Speaker Bagbin Commissions MPs constituency office under parliamentary decentralisation programme
53 minutes -
Black Stars technical advisor Winfried Schäfer sacked as GFA shakes up backroom staff
58 minutes -
Wenchi water project almost complete, critical to gov’t agenda – GWL MD
1 hour -
Anti-LGBTQ+ bill not part of government’s legislative agenda – Inusah Fuseini
1 hour -
Anti-LGBTQ Bill: Forget the rumour mongers, I’m a man of action, and will pass the bill – Speaker
2 hours -
Women and children among those killed in Sudanese army shelling of wedding celebration
2 hours -
President Mahama is not sincere with Ghanaians on LGBTQ bill matter – Hassan Tampuli
2 hours -
Gov’t to establish Prison Industrial Hub to equip inmates with income-generating skills – Prison Service boss
3 hours -
Alhassan Tampuli donates cement, roofing sheets to support storm victims in Gushegu
3 hours -
Alhassan Tampuli appeals for urgent support for storm victims in Gushegu
3 hours -
The hypocrisy must stop; pass Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill now – Alhassan Tampuli to Mahama
3 hours -
Imprisonment should be rehabilitative, not punitive – Ghana Prisons boss at UNGA
3 hours -
Ga Adangbe traditional priests petition Mahama over McDan aviation licence revocation
3 hours