Criticize a public official on social media, and you are most likely to get blocked from engaging with that account on the platform. This punitive action was not taken by the social media company as a response to a violation of community rules; it was a deliberate action by the so-called public servant who feeds off your taxes.
There is a troubling trend in Ghana’s digital media landscape that significantly threatens the very essence of freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution. Taxpayers whose contributions sustain the very existence of public officials are being blocked from sharing opposing views. Noticeable culprits in this act are elected Members of Parliament. There have also been cited occasions of the President taking such action against critics, and quite recently, the Ghana Police Service.
This action raises significant questions about the boundaries of free expression and the impact it has on Ghana, a country highly regarded and respected as the beacon of democracy in Africa.
Article 21(1a) of our Constitution upholds the citizen’s right to freedom of speech. It states, "All persons shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression, which shall include freedom of the press and other media." This fundamental right is the bedrock of a healthy democracy, fostering open dialogue and holding public officials accountable for their actions. Unfortunately, the recent actions of public officials cast a shadow on this constitutionally enshrined principle.
Such actions carry broader implications as they represent a suppression of diverse opinions. In a democratic society, citizens must be free to express their views without fear of a punitive response. This is a right that must be jealously protected.
Of course, there is the other argument that the actions of public officials are an expression of their speech. However, as a country that is keen on strengthening its democratic credentials, it must draw lessons from developed democracies such as the US, where the law is somewhat tilted in favor of the citizens as a way of ensuring and reminding public officials that they are accountable to the people. We would leave this argument to the courts to decide!
As we deliberate on this worrying development, it is worth noting that the Supreme Court of the United States is set to make a landmark ruling on a similar matter in 2024, answering the question of whether public officials violate the Constitution’s First Amendment when they block someone on social media. This highlights the global relevance of the issue at hand. The ruling will likely set a precedent that could influence how other nations, including Ghana, navigate the intersection of social media and freedom of speech.
I hold the view that the act of public officials blocking critics on social media undermines the principles of democratic governance, as it sends a clear message that dissent is not welcomed, fostering an environment of self-censorship. Public officials must recognize that they are to serve the public’s interest, and their actions should reflect their resolve to uphold the constitutional rights of citizens.
Ghana’s democracy is evolving, and public officials must fully embrace democratic principles. The impending ruling by the US Supreme Court serves as a timely reminder that the issues surrounding freedom of speech on social media are of global significance, transcending borders and impacting the very fabric of democratic governance.
In conclusion, the practice of public officials in Ghana blocking citizens on social media is a cause for concern. It undermines the fundamental right to freedom of speech as enshrined in Ghana’s Constitution, and steps must be taken to address this issue. As we await the decision of the US Supreme Court, it is an opportune moment for reflection and a renewed commitment to the principles that uphold the democratic ideals we hold dear as a country.
The author of this article is Jeffrey Nyabor, a journalist and media law enthusiast.
Latest Stories
-
Akosombo Dam Spillage: Would victims have been ignored if they were in swing constituencies – Ablakwa fumes
5 mins -
Have capacity to influence policy – former MiDA boss to engineers
16 mins -
Silva to leave Chelsea at end of season
19 mins -
Ghana’s Online Freedom of Expression in peril, citizens’ rights eroded – Londa Report
23 mins -
CAF Confed Cup: Karim Zito blames semi-final exit on lack of experience
28 mins -
CAFCC: Dreams FC didn’t lose because of stage fright – Karim Zito
35 mins -
ECG threatens to disconnect Ashanti Regional Minister’s residence if found to be in debt
46 mins -
Gladys Bosco sings about hope in ‘Me Ewurade Bra’
54 mins -
Accra High Court refuses requests to compel Akufo-Addo to receive anti-LGBTQ+ bill
1 hour -
I almost took my life – Fella Makafui
1 hour -
The emergence of the future: Prof. Jane Naana Opoku Agyemang
1 hour -
Knowing when to mute the mic: Kwasi Kwarteng’s choking example on ‘Blue and White’
1 hour -
R. Kelly’s sex abuse conviction in Chicago upheld in appeals court
2 hours -
Azumah Nelson returns to the ring to face EU Ambassador in a match to empower youth
2 hours -
UEFA U-16 Tournament: Black Starlets come from behind to beat Kazakhstan 5-1 in final game
2 hours