Audio By Carbonatix
I am not an expert in etymology, but etymologically, the word ‘husband’ is defined as a man (or male) in a marital relationship. Man or Male in this context is etymologically defined in terms of the physical and gender characteristics of the person.
The reverse is etymologically true of the word, ‘wife’.
As I said earlier, I’m not an etymology expert. But, I do know that while the meaning of words, over time, can be expanded to cover new developments and changing culture, the new phenomenon is often similar in nature and characteristics, thus making it easier for users of the word to identify it with the new developments or changing culture, without creating confusion in the minds of society and especially new learners of the language.
In the definition of ‘husband’, etymologically, a man refers to an individual of a specific gender and physical attributes. The same applies to a woman, in the definition of ‘wife’. Those specific gender and physical attributes of man and woman do not change (even if you want to include a transgender person), and therefore etymologically, the definition of husband and wife also do not change.
It is my strong opinion that, etymologically, the word ‘husband’ can ONLY refer to a married man (a person of the male gender and physical attributes). Similarly, the word ‘wife’ can ONLY refer to a married woman (a person of the female gender and physical attributes).
Any attempt to force a new meaning of husband and wife on society in order to accommodate lesbian and gay couples is etymologically wrong and only creates confusion in the minds of people, especially young learners of the language. If this is deliberately being done to force the indoctrination of same-sex marriage on society, that’s equally wrong and unacceptable. Forcing the media to use phrases like ‘her wife’ and ‘his husband’ is unacceptable and etymologically wrong and disingenuous.
You can find a new lexicon to describe your new legal relationships, but you cannot have a world where one word can mean two things that are diametrically opposite to each other in nature and characteristics! We cannot have a world where we define a man as both a male and a female. And if a man cannot be defined to include a female, then a husband can also not be defined as a man or woman in a marital relationship.
Latest Stories
-
National Sports Fund needs strong leadership from the top – Administrator David Wuaku
2 minutes -
JoySports Exclusive: Steve McLaren in talks with GFA after expressing interest in Black Stars job
8 minutes -
Fire guts auto parts warehouse at Bubuashie, one fire officer injured
14 minutes -
I owe my victory to coach Ofori Asare – Allotey after winning WBA Africa Gold Super Flyweight belt
18 minutes -
Church of Pentecost supports over 2,000 BECE candidates in Obuasi with career guidance seminar
2 hours -
Brandon Asante and Coventry all but promoted to Premier League despite Sheffield Wednesday draw
2 hours -
GPL 2025/26: Late Kwartemaa strike downs Hearts in Tema
2 hours -
Ghana Faces Sierra Leone Moment as Prosecutorial Powers come under strain
3 hours -
Don’t consume fish or seafood from Tema Shipyard until further notice – FDA warns
3 hours -
Why volunteering might be Africa’s most underrated career accelerator
3 hours -
ActionAid Ghana raises concern over gender gaps in Feed Ghana Programme
3 hours -
Windstorm wreaks havoc in Gushegu, displacing nearly 2,000 residents and damaging schools
3 hours -
Friends of Bridget Bonnie Marks her 35th birthday with donation to Kasseh Model Health Centre
4 hours -
From Ekumfi Kokodo to the Pulpit Stage: Essi Donkor’s gospel journey takes shape
4 hours -
Landfilling waste management creates no value, it’s an economic waste
4 hours