
Audio By Carbonatix
The Supreme Court has dismissed an application for an injunction against approving President Akufo-Addo’s new ministerial appointees.
The application, filed by South Dayi legislator Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor, was deemed frivolous and an abuse of court processes by the apex court.
There were interesting twists today as the Supreme Court presided over the application filed by the National Democratic Congress (NDC) Member of Parliament, as the fate of newly nominated ministers and reshuffled ministers appointed by President Akufo-Addo hung in the balance.

This was the application based on which the Speaker of Parliament decided to hold off on okaying the new appointees after their vetting.
In his lawsuit against the Speaker of Parliament (1st defendant) and the Attorney General (2nd defendant), Dafeamekpor argued that the President should have sought parliamentary approval before reassigning ministers whose appointments were revoked.
President Akufo-Addo's reshuffle on February 14, 2024, saw 13 ministers and 10 deputy ministers relieved of their posts, while 6 were reassigned to various portfolios.
- Read more: Parliament suspends approval of Akufo-Addo’s new ministers, deputies amid row over anti-gay bill
There was drama in court today as the applicant Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor and his lawyers were absent.
At a point, the case was stood down for the court to verify some facts of the case, particularly regarding whether the bailiff served the parties, especially the Plaintiff, Mr Dafeamekpor, with a hearing notice.
The Attorney General criticised the conduct of the MP's lawyer, describing it as the highest form of disrespect to the apex court and as professional misconduct.
Despite the absence of Mr Dafeamekpor and his lawyer, the court proceeded with the case, which took an interesting turn as the lawyer for the NDC legislator refused to accept court documents to be served on him, including a hearing notice.
The lawyers for the Speaker of Parliament opposed the injunction application, arguing that it did not satisfy the requirements for an injunction to be granted.
Ultimately, the case was thrown out by the Supreme Court.
The five judges presiding over the case were Justice Kingsley Koomson, Justice Mariama Owusu, Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo (Presiding), Justice Amadu Tanko, and Justice Yaw Darko Asare.
In the end, despite the absence of Mr Dafeamekpor's lawyers, the Supreme Court ruled against the injunction application.
Latest Stories
-
QNET renews commitment to EOCO partnership in combating human trafficking and Model Q criminal networks
3 minutes -
Normalising flood risk is worsening Accra’s vulnerability – JoyNews Jacqueline Ansomah Yeboah
5 minutes -
Governing The Rain: Flood risk, institutional failure, and the politics of urban infrastructure in Accra
6 minutes -
KGL Foundation brings free health screening to Bolgatanga, promotes early disease detection
9 minutes -
‘I didn’t think it was a foul’: Trump says he asked FIFA president for review of controversial red card
21 minutes -
Trump confirms he asked Fifa to review Balogun ban
23 minutes -
WAFCON 2026: Morocco aim to break final barrier after two final appearances
28 minutes -
WAFCON 2026: Algeria ready to challenge Africa’s elite
32 minutes -
Ghana’s accommodation mix is shifting and Airbnb-style stays are quietly winning ground
34 minutes -
UTAG backs down on nationwide strike after government assurances
37 minutes -
WAFCON 2026: Senegal eye semi-final breakthrough
39 minutes -
WAFCON 2026: Kenya return to the continental stage after a decade
42 minutes -
Gov’t constructing eight new GIS regional offices to strengthen border security – Interior Minister
51 minutes -
The dark side of the Brazilian butt lift boom
59 minutes -
Why Ghana cannot defeat galamsey
60 minutes