https://www.myjoyonline.com/volta-secessionist-should-face-the-fullest-extent-of-the-law-occupy-ghana/-------https://www.myjoyonline.com/volta-secessionist-should-face-the-fullest-extent-of-the-law-occupy-ghana/
File photo

Occupy Ghana, a social and political non-partisan pressure group has called on government to prosecute “to the fullest extent possible” suspects responsible for the recent violent secessionist attacks in the Volta Region.

While acknowledging government’s initial response to the activities of the secessionists, Occupy Ghana noted that the “brazenness of any illegal group should be matched with a strong enforcement of the law.”

According to Occupy Ghana, “secession, separation or severing of any part of this great nation is a treasonous anathema that should not and cannot even be broached".

In a press statement, the organization debunked several claims made by the secessionist group concerning their mandate over the once British Togoland Territory.

They stated that the legislative history leading to the amalgamation of the British Togoland to the then Gold Coast is "uncontestable as propagated by the Western Togolanders, and thus the territory of Ghana cannot be compromised".

“Section 1 of the 1957 Ghana Independence Act (the legislation by which Britain granted independence) identified the new independent territory as ‘the Gold Coast as defined in and for the purposes of the Gold Coast (Constitution) Order-In-Council, 1954.’ Section 1(1) of this Order-In-Council defined ‘the Gold Coast’ as ‘the Gold Coast Colony, Ashanti and the Northern Territories of the Gold Coast; and for the purposes of this Order references to the Gold Coast shall be construed as including Togoland under United Kingdom Trusteeship.’”

They added that: “Having adopted this inclusive definition of ‘the Gold Coast,’ the Independence Act then provided that that ‘Gold Coast…SHALL as from [6 March 1957] TOGETHER FORM part of Her Majesty’s dominions under the name of Ghana,’ and that ‘as from [6 March 1957], Her Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom shall have no responsibility for the government of Ghana or any part thereof.’”

Occupy Ghana therefore argues that the claims of the secessionists are false and baseless.

“It is therefore blindingly obvious that the claim that some other or further document or action was required to unite the then British Togoland with the rest of the Gold Coast, is palpably baseless and profoundly false.”

Occupy Ghana further called for the heavy hand of the law to be dealt on the secessionists as it breaches Ghana’s Prohibited Organsiations Act, as  well as several other Criminal Acts in the constitution.

They said: “The 1976 Prohibited Organisations Act was passed when similar secession cries emerged. That Act specifically declares as unlawful and prohibited, any organisation ‘howsoever called, whose objects include advocating and promoting the secession from the Republic of Ghana of the former British Mandated Territory of Togoland or part of that territory or the integration of that territory with a foreign territory.’

The Act per the statement, also makes it "an extra-territorial crime to belong to any such organisation or for it to meet, advertise, campaign, use slogans, and/or obtain support or financing. The punishment for flouting this Act is up to five years in prison.”

Occupy Ghana, therefore, maintain that the territories of Ghana are non-negotiable and government should guard jealously the boundaries of the sovereign territories of Ghana.

However, in line with the constitutional injunction on the State to "foster a spirit of loyalty to Ghana that overrides sectional, ethnic and other loyalties", Occupy Ghana urged the government "to ascertain any relevant and justified grievances, and address those that are capable of being addressed".

The pressure group also cautioned against being “lulled into a false sense of security, especially as an election approaches.”
 


DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.


DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.