https://www.myjoyonline.com/gaddafi-not-targeted-by-strikes/-------https://www.myjoyonline.com/gaddafi-not-targeted-by-strikes/
Allied forces carrying out air strikes in Libya say Colonel Muammar Gaddafi himself is not a target, despite an overnight attack against his compound. The chief of UK armed forces said attacks on Libya's leader were "not allowed" under a UN resolution calling for the protection of Libyan civilians. And a French spokesman said that even if the Libyan leader's exact location was known, he would not be fired on. Col Gaddafi has been fighting a rebellion that broke out last month. Tripoli complex hit On Sunday UK Defence Secretary Liam Fox said targeting Col Gaddafi could "potentially be a possibility". But on Monday Britain's Chief of Defence Staff, Sir David Richards, said he was "absolutely not" a target. "It's not allowed under the UN resolution," he added. The document, approved by the Security Council last week, authorises "all necessary measures" to protect civilians from pro-Gaddafi forces - including a no-fly zone. A French defence ministry spokesman, Laurent Tesseire, also said the aim of the strikes was solely to protect civilians and Col Gaddafi himself was not a target. Asked by French radio whether the Libyan leader would be fired on if his exact whereabouts was known, he said: "The answer to that is no." The comments came after a second night of US-led action in Libya. Ten to 12 missiles were fired, a spokesman for the US Africa Command said. In Tripoli, Col Gaddafi's sprawling Bab al-Aziziya complex was hit. Western journalists taken to the compound were shown a ruined building. An official from one of the coalition countries, who asked not to be named, told journalists the strike had destroyed Col Gaddafi's "command and control capability". It is not known whether the colonel was there at the time of the bombing. The action against Col Gaddafi began on Saturday with French air strikes in the east. A barrage of cruise missiles, launched from US and British surface ships and submarines followed. On Sunday US Navy Vice Admiral William Gortney said the coalition had control of the air space between Tripoli and the main rebel stronghold, Benghazi in the east. "The no-fly zone is effectively in place," he said. He added that ground forces moving on rebel positions were also open to attack. 'Misinterpreted' In Moscow, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin condemned the UN resolution as "flawed". "It allows everything," he said on Monday. "It resembles medieval calls for crusades." Russia abstained during the Security Council vote on the resolution last week. The BBC's Steve Rosenberg in Moscow says Mr Putin's strong criticism may be designed to distance himself from President Dmitry Medvedev's foreign policy decisions and boost his own domestic popularity by talking tough. Mr Medvedev said Mr Putin's use of the word "crusade" was unacceptable. Arab League Secretary General Amr Moussa, who had previously appeared to criticise the coalition air strikes, said on Monday his comments had been "misinterpreted" and that the league was "committed to UN Security Council Resolution 1973". Diplomats say a UN Security Council meeting will be held behind closed doors on Monday to discuss the Libyan situation. Envoys from Nato met in Brussels on Monday to try to sort out any differences of strategy, amid concerns from Turkey in particular about military involvement. But French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe said Nato would be ready to support the coalition within "a few days". Renewed fighting was reported in Misrata, 200km (130 miles) east of Tripoli, on Monday. The city has been under siege by government troops and rebel spokesmen said pro-Gaddafi forces were using "overwhelming firepower" and had bombarded the city for a fourth day. Source: BBC

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:  


DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.