
Audio By Carbonatix
Chelsea have announced the biggest pre-tax loss in Premier League history.
The £262m deficit for 2024-25 eclipses the £197.5m loss Manchester City incurred in 2011.
It comes despite Chelsea bringing in £490.9m in revenue, which the club says is the second-highest total in their history.
In 2024-25, the Blues won the UEFA Conference League and Club World Cup, and finished fourth in the Premier League.
The club insist they remain compliant with financial regulations such as Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR), which allow losses of £105m over three years.
Figures used to calculate this are different to the pure pre-tax loss.
Chelsea have spent more than £1bn on players since BlueCo took over in 2022, signing a raft of younger players on long-term contracts.
Uefa fined the club £26.7m at the start of the season for breaching squad‑cost ratio rules and is also monitoring them over a three‑year period.
Sources have told BBC Sport that the reported losses include fines - among them the £10.75m Premier League sanction relating to agent payments made under Roman Abramovich's ownership - as well as write‑offs in the accounts for high‑profile players such as Raheem Sterling, who was released, and Mykhailo Mudryk, who is being investigated over a failed drugs test.
Chelsea believe income will be at record levels in their next accounts, with an extra £85m earned from winning the Club World Cup, plus about £80m in television revenue from the Champions League.
The loss is less than the £355m quoted on UEFA's benchmarking report last month.
That figure is understood to result from sales between two clubs in a multi-club model being excluded, with Chelsea having the same owners as French outfit Strasbourg.
Chelsea also revealed their women's team lost £17.1m in 2024-25, with revenue at £21.3m.
What Chelsea need to do to stop the losses
It is important to note that Chelsea have not yet released their full accounts, which will soon be published at Companies House and are expected to provide a more detailed picture.
The only information currently available is from the statement made by Chelsea on Wednesday., external
"People ask whether Chelsea are a football club or a hedge‑fund experiment. I don't think these accounts offer any clearer answer. We are still waiting to see the full picture on Companies House," said football finance expert Kieran Maguire.
He said the figures highlighted the importance of Champions League football to a club that is currently sixth in the league.
He added: "For every one pound you receive from broadcasting [in the Champions League], you only get 11p in the Conference League, and it is much harder for the marketing department to sell a hospitality box for a match against the second‑best team in Denmark than when Barcelona come to town."
There are also concerns that Stamford Bridge is beginning to look dated, leaving Chelsea at risk of falling behind their rivals, particularly with new Premier League squad-cost ratio rules coming into force this summer.
These replace PSR and allow clubs to spend 85% of their total revenues on squad-related costs.
"Chelsea have only a 40,000‑capacity stadium and are around half of Manchester United's size, and probably £50-60m behind others," Maguire added.
"With the introduction of the new squad‑cost ratio rules, it is really important for clubs to boost revenue wherever they can.
"Chelsea are simply behind their rivals, with less to spend on players - and that will take its toll over time."
Maguire agreed that it was unlikely Chelsea would breach Premier League regulations.
Chelsea made a £128.4m profit last year - almost entirely due to the sale of their women's team to themselves, a loophole that has since been closed by the league.
It means pre-tax losses over the past three years are about £220m in total, but Maguire said that Chelsea would have needed to submit the losses accounted for under PSR by 31 December.
"The lack of any news suggests the league is satisfied with their PSR figures," Maguire said.
Latest Stories
-
EU envoys meet to negotiate 21st Russia sanctions package
25 minutes -
Actor Rebel Wilson did not defame colleague in social media posts, Australian court finds
36 minutes -
Fewer children got US-backed HIV treatment after aid cuts, study finds
42 minutes -
Nike to tighten online sales in China amid ‘cluttered’ marketplace
51 minutes -
Iraq’s oil minister says US energy deals worth about $200 billion
1 hour -
Oil prices rise slightly after US announces new round of strikes on Iran
1 hour -
US, China to hold AI talks in September, sources say
2 hours -
Alphabet’s Gemini delay, spending worries loom over earnings
2 hours -
TikTok US chief security officer to testify before US House on September 15
2 hours -
OpenAI says AI models went rogue during testing, triggering ‘unprecedented’ breach at startup
2 hours -
Great Apes kiss and cuddle to keep the peace, says study
2 hours -
Iraola wants Mac Allister & Alisson to stay with Liverpool
2 hours -
Bournemouth reject £64m bid from Chelsea for Scott
3 hours -
Al-Hilal agree £60m deal for West Ham’s Summerville
3 hours -
‘Pressure is intense and scrutiny constant’ – referee Taylor retires
3 hours