Audio By Carbonatix
The IMANI Centre for Policy and Education has dragged the Attorney General and Ministry of Justice to the Supreme Court over the appointments of the heads of the various uniformed security agencies across the country.
In a writ filed in association with security analyst, Prof Kwesi Aning, the plaintiffs are asking the apex court to issue a declaration that upon a true and proper interpretation of the letter and spirit of Articles 200, 202(1), 202(2), 202(3), 205, 207(1), 207(2), 207(3), 190(1), 191,196, 199, and 269 of the 1992 Constitution of Ghana, the President of the Republic of Ghana has no authority to terminate the appointment or removal from office heads of the agencies unless only upon proven stated misconduct or misbehaviour established against these office holders.
These offices included the office of the Chief Fire Officer of the Fire Service; Inspector General of Police; Director General of Prisons Service and Comptroller General of Immigration Service.
Again, the two are seeking a declaration that ..."The President of the Republic of Ghana upon assumption of Office does not have the power to make a fresh appoint to the office of the Chief Fire Officer of the Fire Service; Inspector General of Police; Director General of Prisons Service and Comptroller General of the Immigration Service unless the immediate holder of the office is deceased.....".
They are also seeking relief that the appointment of the heads of these uniformed security services by a new president who has been voted into power and sworn into office is unconstitutional.
Providing more details to back their case, the two argued that there are concerning trends where new governments compel the termination of the appointment of these heads while disregarding their constitutional rights.
"In some cases, these removals occur before the individual occupants of the office reach the statutory retirement age.
"For instance in 2017, the then Director-General of the Prisons Service, Mr. Emmanuel Yao Adzator was asked to proceed on leave at the age of 54 and subsequently another was appointed in his stead," part of the writ dated March 11, 2024 and sighted by JoyNews read.
They are, therefore, demanding a consequential order to restrain or prevent the President of the Republic from dismissing or removing or attempting to dismiss or remove the appointment of persons occupying the offices of the Chief Fire Officer of the Fire Service; Inspector General of Police; Director-General of Prisons Service, Comptroller General of Immigration Service unless only in cases of proven and stated misconduct or misbehaviour established against such persons or upon retirement or resignation or death or incapacity to perform the functions of the office because of infirmity of body and mind.
Find the full writ below:
Latest Stories
-
Student arraigned over alleged GH¢24,849 ATM card fraud in Accra
6 minutes -
“Gold in the ground is not dead wealth”, Ghana’s proven gold reserves estimated at US$146bn – CPS
6 minutes -
Accra doesn’t have a transport problem, it has a reliability problem
8 minutes -
Accra commuters endure long queues despite transport reforms
18 minutes -
“In the midst of abundant gold, we are a liquidity trap” — Prof. Alagidede
19 minutes -
Kennedy Agyapong emerges frontrunner in NPP flagbearer race in new study
23 minutes -
Creative Arts Agency plans highlife festival for 2026 – Gideon Aryeequaye
26 minutes -
Trump links Greenland dispute to not getting Nobel Peace Prize
41 minutes -
GRA to deploy AI to tackle import fraud from February 1
42 minutes -
Government renews curfew in Nkwanta South amid security concerns
49 minutes -
StarOil CEO takes swipe at rivals over fuel pricing as firm posts record daily sales
49 minutes -
South African team helps search for politician swept away by Mozambique floodwaters
50 minutes -
Thirteen schoolchildren killed after bus collides with lorry in South Africa
54 minutes -
Daily Insight for CEOs: The CEO’s role in strengthening execution discipline across the organization
58 minutes -
Ofori-Atta is happy ahead of January 20 immigration hearing – Lawyer says
59 minutes
