Meta Platforms said in a court filing on Monday that four states were seeking $1.4 ​trillion in penalties over accusations the company designed its Facebook and Instagram platforms to addict young users and misled the ‌public about their safety.

Meta put forward the figure in its response to the attorneys general's filings on how penalties should be calculated if the states prevailed at trial.

The number, which has not previously been disclosed and is close to Meta’s market capitalisation of around $1.5 trillion, comes ahead of an August trial in Oakland, California, over ​the claims brought by California, Colorado, Kentucky and New Jersey against the company.

Meta said the amount was unsupported by the evidence.

"A ​sanction of that size has no analogue in the history of consumer protection enforcement," the company said in ⁠the filing.

Representatives for the attorneys general did not immediately respond to requests for comment after the filing.

TALLYING DAMAGES

The states' filings are sealed, but ​at a court hearing in June they said they were calculating the penalties by multiplying the number of violations by fine amounts set by state law. The ​number of violations is based on the estimated number of teens and young users affected by Meta's actions, the states said.

Twenty-nine states have sued Meta in federal court, most alleging that the company violated the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act by collecting data from children without proper parental consent.

The trial in August before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will address all claims brought under that law, as well as the four states’ allegations that the company violated their state laws protecting consumers by misleading them about the safety of their platforms.

Meta has denied the allegations, saying the attorneys general have no evidence it ‌misled consumers ⁠about its platforms' alleged addictiveness because "social media addiction" is not an established psychiatric condition, and therefore statements that its platforms were not addictive could not be false.

A further 14 states have brought claims under their own laws, which will be heard at a separate trial in February.

Last month, Rogers rejected Meta’s bid to cancel the trial, saying there remained factual disputes over whether its social media platforms were addictive, whether Meta falsely denied it ​designed them that way, and whether ​it "partially" directed the platforms at ⁠children.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta said after Rogers' ruling that Meta was putting profits ahead of children's safety and breaking consumer protection laws, promising to hold the company "fully accountable" for its role in the teen mental health ​crisis.

Meta, Snapchat and parent Snap Inc, YouTube and parent Alphabet Inc., and TikTok and parent ByteDance are ​facing thousands of lawsuits ⁠in both federal and state court over claims they knowingly designed their platforms to have features that addict children and teens, fueling a mental health crisis.

States across the country have sued the companies, some as part of the case before Rogers and others in their home state courts. New Mexico ⁠was the ​first to go to trial, and a jury awarded the state $375 million in March ​after finding the company had misled New Mexico consumers.

A judge in New Mexico is currently weighing the second portion of the state’s case, which seeks additional damages and a court order ​directing the company to make changes to its Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp platforms.