An Administrator at Ghana Cocoa Board (COCOBOD) says the entity’s sole sourcing and thresholds for the purchase of fertilizers are done per the Procurement Act.   

Bernice Debrah Ashong said the Procurement Unit of COCOBOD prepared composite letters with all the names of the fertiliser companies to the Public Procurement Authority (PPA) attached with their documents for approvals.   

The subpoenaed witness for Seidu Agongo was speaking in his evidence in Chief in the trial, involving Dr Stephen Opuni, a former Chief Executive of COCOBOD, led by Mr Benson Nutsukpui, Counsel for Agongo.    

Dr Opuni and Mr Agongo are facing 27 charges, including defrauding by false pretences, willfully causing financial loss to the State, money laundering, and corruption by a public officer in contravention of the Public Procurement Act.    

They have both pleaded not guilty to the charges and are on a GH¢300,000 self-recognisance bail each.    

Read also: Supreme Court dismisses Opuni’s appeal, orders trial to continue

Madam Ashong, who is a Senior Administrator at Koforidua, said the Procurement Unit per the structure of the Board reported directly to the Director of Finance.   

She said these chemicals were dealt with in a Unit of the Board called the CODEPEC and HITECH Unit.   

She said at the inception of the purchase of fertilisers, the procurement Unit would request the CODEPEC/HITECH Unit to provide the list of fertiliser companies they intended to procure from.  

The witness said the list would include the type of fertilisers, name of company, price and the quantity to be purchased.   

She said on the receipt of the list, the Unit sent a draft letter to the companies requesting them to provide their best offer in terms of price, SSNIT certificates, and their performance guarantee, among others.   

“These letters are submitted to the Director of Finance for vetting and confirming before submitting to the office of the Chief Executive,” she added. 

She said the letters would be distributed to the companies for their responses to be submitted to the Office of the Chief Executive and then forwarded to the Director of Finance and back to the Procurement Unit.    

The witness said after receiving their responses, it was then put together in the form of a document and then forwarded to the Entity Tender Committee of the Board for approval.   

She said when these requests were approved by the Committee, another composite letter was prepared by the Procurement Unit for the Director of Finance for vetting and confirmation and then submitted to the Central Tender Review Board (CTRB) for concurrent approval.   

The composite letter includes the type of fertilisers each company need to supply, the quantity and the Price and names of all the approved companies.   

She said that based on the approval of the CTRB forwarded their approval to the Office of the Chief Executive.   

Read also: Change of panel on Opuni case worrying – LINSOD

The witness, who was a former Procurement Manager, said the document goes through Management to the Director of Finance Office to the Procurement Unit.     

“When we received the approval, we prepared a draft letter for notification of approval for the individual fertiliser company on the approved list,” he said.   

She said on the notification of award, the companies are requested to provide a performance guarantee and other terms and conditions and these letters are forwarded to the Director of Finance for vetting and confirmation before submitting to the office of the Chief Executive for signature.   

Madam Ashong said the purchase of machines and insecticide also went through the same methods but when additional information was needed the Board would require from the supplier like an EPA certificate.