
Audio By Carbonatix
The Executive Director of the Africa Centre for Parliamentary Affairs (ACEPA) believes the interference of the Supreme Court in parliamentary affairs has significantly influenced the Speaker's decision to decline a recall of the House.
According to Dr Rasheed Draman, many Members of Parliament (MPs), particularly from the National Democratic Congress (NDC) caucus, believe that while the Supreme Court can make any ruling it deems fit, it does not govern Parliament.
Speaking on JoyFM’s Top Story on Wednesday, Dr Draman suggested that Alban Bagbin’s refusal to recall Parliament in response to the Majority’s request could be linked to concerns over the Supreme Court’s involvement in parliamentary matters.
“Particularly because the Speaker was asked to use his discretion. I believe he would also say let me use the powers that I have and if you want, go and ask the court to force Parliament to come and sit,” he said.
His comments follow the Speaker’s decision to decline the Majority’s request to reconvene Parliament for urgent government business.
Instead, Alban Bagbin clarified that Parliament would resume after the December 7 general elections to address essential matters, ensuring a smooth transition to the 9th Parliament of the Fourth Republic.
"The House will resume sitting after the elections to complete all essential matters, ensuring a seamless transition to the 9th Parliament of the Fourth Republic of Ghana,” Bagbin stated.
He emphasised the importance of decorum in parliamentary proceedings and urged MPs to prioritise the national interest.
Dr Draman further noted that the memo from the Majority Leader requesting the recall was an attempt to reconcile with the Speaker and foster unity in the House.
However, he argued that this effort should have been initiated earlier during the initial controversy over seating arrangements in Parliament.
"I would have thought that this would have come much earlier at the beginning of the crisis. Because some of us at the beginning of the crisis said you can’t use legal tools to resolve what looks like a political problem that could be resolved by the two sides including the Speaker," Dr Draman remarked.
He also contended that even if Parliament were to be recalled, NDC MPs would meticulously scrutinise all proceedings.
He noted that matters previously allowed to pass without much contention would now likely face extensive legal and procedural review.
Latest Stories
-
Conflicting reports on Ghanaian’s death in South Africa disturbing — Jinapor
7 minutes -
Ryanair warns of ‘queue chaos’ from new EU border system
9 minutes -
Akatsi South MCE calls for more support as 13 schools receive dual desks
10 minutes -
Ghana Sports Fund boss courts global support for youth sports development
14 minutes -
China says pilot crashed small plane into skyscraper for ‘personal reasons’
25 minutes -
Police intercept 50,000 rounds of ammunition in Upper West, arrest three suspects
26 minutes -
Vatican excommunicates hundreds of thousands of splinter sect followers
28 minutes -
Access Plus Communications launches ‘Eye Focus App’ to broaden reach of AI-powered vision screening
29 minutes -
Asiedu Nketiah urges African leaders to match economic rhetoric with action
30 minutes -
24-Hour Economy Authority and Petrochemical Holdings GmbH partner to establish 2 projects in Ghana
34 minutes -
Accra Floods: Greater Accra Minister directs MMDCEs to ensure fair distribution of relief items
38 minutes -
Ghana must balance Climate Action with Energy Security – Experts urge
42 minutes -
Boycotting South African goods not the solution to xenophobic attacks — Prof Antwi-Danso
43 minutes -
Discipline must build unity, not endanger victory
51 minutes -
Family announces change of venue for Beverly Afaglo’s funeral
1 hour