Audio By Carbonatix
The Executive Director of the Africa Centre for Parliamentary Affairs (ACEPA) believes the interference of the Supreme Court in parliamentary affairs has significantly influenced the Speaker's decision to decline a recall of the House.
According to Dr Rasheed Draman, many Members of Parliament (MPs), particularly from the National Democratic Congress (NDC) caucus, believe that while the Supreme Court can make any ruling it deems fit, it does not govern Parliament.
Speaking on JoyFM’s Top Story on Wednesday, Dr Draman suggested that Alban Bagbin’s refusal to recall Parliament in response to the Majority’s request could be linked to concerns over the Supreme Court’s involvement in parliamentary matters.
“Particularly because the Speaker was asked to use his discretion. I believe he would also say let me use the powers that I have and if you want, go and ask the court to force Parliament to come and sit,” he said.
His comments follow the Speaker’s decision to decline the Majority’s request to reconvene Parliament for urgent government business.
Instead, Alban Bagbin clarified that Parliament would resume after the December 7 general elections to address essential matters, ensuring a smooth transition to the 9th Parliament of the Fourth Republic.
"The House will resume sitting after the elections to complete all essential matters, ensuring a seamless transition to the 9th Parliament of the Fourth Republic of Ghana,” Bagbin stated.
He emphasised the importance of decorum in parliamentary proceedings and urged MPs to prioritise the national interest.
Dr Draman further noted that the memo from the Majority Leader requesting the recall was an attempt to reconcile with the Speaker and foster unity in the House.
However, he argued that this effort should have been initiated earlier during the initial controversy over seating arrangements in Parliament.
"I would have thought that this would have come much earlier at the beginning of the crisis. Because some of us at the beginning of the crisis said you can’t use legal tools to resolve what looks like a political problem that could be resolved by the two sides including the Speaker," Dr Draman remarked.
He also contended that even if Parliament were to be recalled, NDC MPs would meticulously scrutinise all proceedings.
He noted that matters previously allowed to pass without much contention would now likely face extensive legal and procedural review.
Latest Stories
-
Legal vacation trials: Chief Justice has power to order specific cases heard – Young Lawyers Forum President
22 minutes -
Oil rises as doubts over US-Iran deal heighten supply concerns
40 minutes -
Nigeria police say 10 officers, 17 suspected bandits killed in clash in Kebbi state
49 minutes -
Vacation courts can handle substantive matters – Young Lawyers Forum challenges GBA position
55 minutes -
Oil, gold prices rise as geopolitical tensions mount before CPI
1 hour -
Congo says number of confirmed Ebola cases rises to 4,449
1 hour -
Trump says he switched planes after Nato summit because of possible threat
1 hour -
Ghana’s exports surpass imports after two decades of trade imbalances
2 hours -
Gold concentration exposes Ghana to export risks – GSS
2 hours -
Ghana’s tomato, ginger shortfalls deepen import bill, CSIR researchers say
2 hours -
Beyond connectivity, Telecel Group is investing in young learners’ digital and soft skills
2 hours -
Here’s why Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is perfect device for your favourite content
2 hours -
UAE donates relief items worth over GH¢12m to June 29 flood victims
2 hours -
Ghana strengthens fight against sea crimes with major Maritime Offences Bill
3 hours -
South Africa dump site collapse kills 14 suspected illegal miners
4 hours