Audio By Carbonatix
The Executive Director of the Africa Centre for Parliamentary Affairs (ACEPA) believes the interference of the Supreme Court in parliamentary affairs has significantly influenced the Speaker's decision to decline a recall of the House.
According to Dr Rasheed Draman, many Members of Parliament (MPs), particularly from the National Democratic Congress (NDC) caucus, believe that while the Supreme Court can make any ruling it deems fit, it does not govern Parliament.
Speaking on JoyFM’s Top Story on Wednesday, Dr Draman suggested that Alban Bagbin’s refusal to recall Parliament in response to the Majority’s request could be linked to concerns over the Supreme Court’s involvement in parliamentary matters.
“Particularly because the Speaker was asked to use his discretion. I believe he would also say let me use the powers that I have and if you want, go and ask the court to force Parliament to come and sit,” he said.
His comments follow the Speaker’s decision to decline the Majority’s request to reconvene Parliament for urgent government business.
Instead, Alban Bagbin clarified that Parliament would resume after the December 7 general elections to address essential matters, ensuring a smooth transition to the 9th Parliament of the Fourth Republic.
"The House will resume sitting after the elections to complete all essential matters, ensuring a seamless transition to the 9th Parliament of the Fourth Republic of Ghana,” Bagbin stated.
He emphasised the importance of decorum in parliamentary proceedings and urged MPs to prioritise the national interest.
Dr Draman further noted that the memo from the Majority Leader requesting the recall was an attempt to reconcile with the Speaker and foster unity in the House.
However, he argued that this effort should have been initiated earlier during the initial controversy over seating arrangements in Parliament.
"I would have thought that this would have come much earlier at the beginning of the crisis. Because some of us at the beginning of the crisis said you can’t use legal tools to resolve what looks like a political problem that could be resolved by the two sides including the Speaker," Dr Draman remarked.
He also contended that even if Parliament were to be recalled, NDC MPs would meticulously scrutinise all proceedings.
He noted that matters previously allowed to pass without much contention would now likely face extensive legal and procedural review.
Latest Stories
-
KGL’s “big payments” are the price of state-backed monopoly, not heroism
1 hour -
Success is built on discipline, not talent – Ace Ankomah on becoming Mfantsipim’s Best Student, from weakest class
2 hours -
The Ga question we prefer not to ask
3 hours -
Korle Klottey’s revenue surges to GH¢40 million as municipality positions itself as an investment hub
3 hours -
EPAC calls for greater investment in packaging to boost local brands
3 hours -
Unpacking the Future of AI: The Promise of Embodied Intelligence
3 hours -
The Inconvenient Truth: Institutions rarely collapse because of bad laws. They collapse when their guardians stop guarding
4 hours -
French singer Patrick Bruel faces rape charges
5 hours -
Canada proposes teen social media ban – with workaround for tech firms
5 hours -
World Cup expected to be the biggest betting event in history
5 hours -
Trump says he ‘loves the inflation’ as US prices rise at fastest rate in three years
5 hours -
Iran says it struck ships in Strait of Hormuz after US launches new strikes
5 hours -
Growing backlash in Japan over Trump’s use of anime characters
6 hours -
Bill Gates says Epstein wanted personal relationship, but he ‘never reciprocated’
6 hours -
Daniel Doe Djirackor
6 hours