Audio By Carbonatix
Twitter, Facebook and Instagram blocked adverts promoting a doctor's book about vaginal health, according to US publisher Kensington.
Numerous social media posts using the words 'vaginal' or 'vagina', advertising Dr Jennifer Gunter's The Vagina Bible, were rejected.
Content without these words was approved.
"We did not take action on Promoted Tweets from this account because of references to sexual organs, as those are permitted within our rules," a Twitter spokesperson told BBC News
"The rejection of some of the promoted content was due to a combination of human error and violations, including the use of profanity and adult products."
Facebook told BBC News that one advert breached its guidelines and another was rejected in error.
"We don't allow ads on Facebook that imply personal attributes, including health-related issues, because we recognise some audiences within our community may be sensitive to this appearing in their feed," a spokesperson commented.
Blocked tweets were later re-instated and Facebook posts using the words vagina and vaginal health were permitted.
Image copyrightFACEBOOK
Image captionOne of the ads rejected by Facebook. The same post was approved once words 'vaginal health' were omitted.
"Vagina is an anatomical term and not a "dirty" word" wrote Dr Jennifer Gunter in a tweet shared thousands of times, and many social media users criticised the platforms' decisions.
The UK-based Vagina Museum also revealed that just one of seven submitted Facebook posts advertising its organisation has been approved.
Kensington Books claimed that Twitter said its sponsored tweets were "promoting adult sexual products and services" or used "inappropriate language".
Image copyrightFACEBOOK
Image captionTop - A rejected Facebook advert for The Vagina Bible. Bottom - An approved Facebook advert using the same language but omitting the book title
Another tweet which included the acronym OBGYN (obstetrician-gynaecologist) as well as a profanity, was permitted once the term OBGYN was omitted.
The Vagina Museum sent BBC News screenshots showing that its Facebook posts were rejected because they were considered to link to "sexual sites" or promote "adult products of services".
The museum, which opens to the public later this year, aims to "fight vagina and vulva stigma" by providing public education.
Dr Gunter, whose book aims to educate women about vaginal health, told BBC News it is "ridiculous" that her publisher could not "buy an ad for a book about vaginas that mentioned the word vagina".
Image copyrightKENSINGTON PUBLISHING CORPS
Image captionDr Jennifer Gunter is a obstetrician-gynaecologist and an advocate for women's health
"Any word that's in a medical dictionary should be used everywhere. It's a valid anatomical term. When you're unable to say a word, the implication is that it's shameful. It's a patriarchal vestige, and I'm done with it," she commented.
Many online criticised Twitter for rejecting the adverts, claiming that the decision "equates female anatomy with pornography" and contributes to social taboos around women's bodies.
Skip Twitter post by @Jessicae13Eaton
Image copyrightFACEBOOK
Image captionOne of the ads rejected by Facebook. The same post was approved once words 'vaginal health' were omitted.
"Vagina is an anatomical term and not a "dirty" word" wrote Dr Jennifer Gunter in a tweet shared thousands of times, and many social media users criticised the platforms' decisions.
The UK-based Vagina Museum also revealed that just one of seven submitted Facebook posts advertising its organisation has been approved.
Kensington Books claimed that Twitter said its sponsored tweets were "promoting adult sexual products and services" or used "inappropriate language".
You might also be interested in:
- US deports foreign student 'over friends' social media posts'
- Mass child sacrifice discovery may be largest in Peru
- Jessi Combs: US race car driver killed in high-speed crash
Image copyrightFACEBOOK
Image captionTop - A rejected Facebook advert for The Vagina Bible. Bottom - An approved Facebook advert using the same language but omitting the book title
Another tweet which included the acronym OBGYN (obstetrician-gynaecologist) as well as a profanity, was permitted once the term OBGYN was omitted.
The Vagina Museum sent BBC News screenshots showing that its Facebook posts were rejected because they were considered to link to "sexual sites" or promote "adult products of services".
The museum, which opens to the public later this year, aims to "fight vagina and vulva stigma" by providing public education.
Dr Gunter, whose book aims to educate women about vaginal health, told BBC News it is "ridiculous" that her publisher could not "buy an ad for a book about vaginas that mentioned the word vagina".
Image copyrightKENSINGTON PUBLISHING CORPS
Image captionDr Jennifer Gunter is a obstetrician-gynaecologist and an advocate for women's health
"Any word that's in a medical dictionary should be used everywhere. It's a valid anatomical term. When you're unable to say a word, the implication is that it's shameful. It's a patriarchal vestige, and I'm done with it," she commented.
Many online criticised Twitter for rejecting the adverts, claiming that the decision "equates female anatomy with pornography" and contributes to social taboos around women's bodies.
Skip Twitter post by @Jessicae13Eaton
7,097 people are talking about this Report End of Twitter post by @Jessicae13Eaton "Vagina is a scientific word, not a dirty word. Let's separate fact from fiction!" wrote one user. Dr Jessica Eaton, an expert in the psychology of victim-blaming, tweeted about her experience of sex education teachers being unwilling to say 'vagina' in lessons but agreeing that it was acceptable to say 'penis'.Dr. Jessica Eaton@Jessicae13Eaton
Thread
One time in 2017 when I was teaching teachers how to deliver good sex ed in schools, at the beginning of the course, the headteacher came to me & said ‘We had a meeting and we all agreed that we will say ‘penis’ but none of us are comfortable saying ‘vagina’ in lessons.’ 16.7K 9:42 AM - Aug 28, 2019 Twitter Ads info and privacy
Related Topics
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Inter beat Parma to clinch Serie A title
54 minutes -
Kumasi Ridge faces temporary outages as ECG begins transformer upgrade from May 6th to 9th
55 minutes -
Concern for jailed Iranian Nobel laureate Narges Mohammadi as brother fears she is dying
55 minutes -
Kenya battles to stop the ‘goons and guns’ as fears of political violence grow
1 hour -
Two US service members reported missing in Morocco, officials say
1 hour -
Shakira thrills a crowd of 2 million with free concert on Brazil’s Copacabana beach
1 hour -
Police officer lowered into crocodile-infested river to recover human remains
1 hour -
Musk’s AI told me people were coming to kill me. I grabbed a hammer and prepared for war
1 hour -
Barca eye historic El Clásico truimph after Real Madrid win
1 hour -
Slot’s VAR fury but loss highlights Liverpool issues
2 hours -
Eddie Howe set to stay in charge of Newcastle after summit
2 hours -
Beijing 2027: Ghana Athletics vows to solve concerns raised by 4x100m relay team after qualification
2 hours -
Barcelona beat Bayern to reach Women’s Champions League final
2 hours -
Blue Skies urges media to highlight responsible businesses on World Press Freedom Day
2 hours -
Sinner wins in Madrid to set Masters title record
2 hours
