Audio By Carbonatix
Executive Director of the Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA), Sulemana Braimah, says Ghanaians need to admit that every sector and institution is becoming quite partisan.
He was speaking in reference to comments made by former president, John Dramani Mahama, at the NDC Lawyers’ Conference where he said the Akufo-Addo administration has packed the bench with judges politically inclined to the NPP.
According to Sulemana Braimah, the former president should not be chastised for commenting on a ‘worrying’ trend, as such comments and questions are needed to protect the sanctity of the judiciary.
“I think that we need to admit that increasingly every sector of our society, every state institution is getting quite partisan and that must be worrying to all of us. And for the judiciary, I often say that when we lose the judiciary it will be the end of our democracy and perhaps the end of our progress. So it is important that we protect the sanctity of our judiciary.
“But the protection of it is not to criticize it when we see things going wrong. If indeed what we’re observing is increasing appointment and packing the courts with those who are inclined to a particular political tradition then we need to say it just as it is said in the US and I believe elsewhere,” he said.
He, however, noted that John Mahama’s comment on balancing the bench with NDC judges was not the right call, rather the entrenchment of the same problem he had identified.
“I think my only problem with the former president’s statement was to say that what we are observing is wrong and when I get the chance to come to power, I would also do the same wrong thing. I think that is what I find fundamentally wrong.
“But for people to accuse him of raising the question about how judges may be of a certain political orientation are getting appointed to the court, I think that is fair, I think we need to have real debate about that,” he said.
To buttress his earlier point, he cited a study carried out by Professor Atuguba which showed that judges were likely to rule in line with the political inclination of their appointing authority in political cases.
Thus the NPP administration stuffing the bench was indeed a matter of concern.
“If you remember in 2018 I think, the revered Professor Raymond Atuguba did a study looking at about a 100 cases that he classified as political cases, and at the end the conclusion was that when you look at the cases and the judges who sat on the cases and who appointed those judges, the conclusion was you’d find that the judgements are always tilted towards the inclinations of those who appointed them. And so we cannot rule it out that that is not a problem we need to talk about and that is the only way we can protect the sanctity of the judiciary,” he said.
Latest Stories
-
Garden City Aquatics discover new swimming talents in maiden school competition at KNUST
8 minutes -
Majority of Ghanaians support establishment of regional tribunals — GlobalInfo Analytics poll
29 minutes -
WAFCON 2026: Morocco set early standard with emphatic win over Kenya
32 minutes -
IERPP questions figures behind Ghana’s Mid-Year Review Budget; demands greater transparency
32 minutes -
WAFCON 2026: Algeria make winning start with victory over Senegal
33 minutes -
Biochar revolution gives Upper East women farmers hope amid fertiliser price hikes
48 minutes -
Edward Debrah writes: Ghana’s perennial flooding and waste management conundrum
48 minutes -
Ghana’s mid-year account proves that money left Treasury. It does not prove that anything arrived
54 minutes -
Former Buffer Stock CEO’s wife seeks court approval to travel to UK for son’s medical treatment
1 hour -
Telecel rewards 3 more customers with monthly cash prizes in Dream Car Promo
1 hour -
Today’s front pages: Monday, July 27, 2026
1 hour -
Armed robbers shoot MoMo vendor in violent Agona Mankron rampage
1 hour -
65% of Ghanaians back Mahama’s decision not to seek a third term — Global InfoAnalytics poll
2 hours -
The Dog Stars to One Night Only: 10 of the best films to watch this August
2 hours -
Dialectical Democracy (Part One)
3 hours