Executive Director of the Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA), Sulemana Braimah, says Ghanaians need to admit that every sector and institution is becoming quite partisan.
He was speaking in reference to comments made by former president, John Dramani Mahama, at the NDC Lawyers’ Conference where he said the Akufo-Addo administration has packed the bench with judges politically inclined to the NPP.
According to Sulemana Braimah, the former president should not be chastised for commenting on a ‘worrying’ trend, as such comments and questions are needed to protect the sanctity of the judiciary.
“I think that we need to admit that increasingly every sector of our society, every state institution is getting quite partisan and that must be worrying to all of us. And for the judiciary, I often say that when we lose the judiciary it will be the end of our democracy and perhaps the end of our progress. So it is important that we protect the sanctity of our judiciary.
“But the protection of it is not to criticize it when we see things going wrong. If indeed what we’re observing is increasing appointment and packing the courts with those who are inclined to a particular political tradition then we need to say it just as it is said in the US and I believe elsewhere,” he said.
He, however, noted that John Mahama’s comment on balancing the bench with NDC judges was not the right call, rather the entrenchment of the same problem he had identified.
“I think my only problem with the former president’s statement was to say that what we are observing is wrong and when I get the chance to come to power, I would also do the same wrong thing. I think that is what I find fundamentally wrong.
“But for people to accuse him of raising the question about how judges may be of a certain political orientation are getting appointed to the court, I think that is fair, I think we need to have real debate about that,” he said.
To buttress his earlier point, he cited a study carried out by Professor Atuguba which showed that judges were likely to rule in line with the political inclination of their appointing authority in political cases.
Thus the NPP administration stuffing the bench was indeed a matter of concern.
“If you remember in 2018 I think, the revered Professor Raymond Atuguba did a study looking at about a 100 cases that he classified as political cases, and at the end the conclusion was that when you look at the cases and the judges who sat on the cases and who appointed those judges, the conclusion was you’d find that the judgements are always tilted towards the inclinations of those who appointed them. And so we cannot rule it out that that is not a problem we need to talk about and that is the only way we can protect the sanctity of the judiciary,” he said.
Latest Stories
-
Sierra Leone energy minister resigns over electricity crisis, as power returns to capital
5 mins -
EC accuses Bright Simons, IMANI Africa of peddling falsehood
34 mins -
GRA/SML contract: Akufo-Addo has whitewashed the KPMG report – Inusah Fuseini
36 mins -
USM Alger receive warm welcome at Oujda Airport ahead of game against RS Berkane
1 hour -
2023/24 Ghana Hockey League to kick-off this weekend
2 hours -
All payments received from our contract with GRA are performance-based, says SML
2 hours -
Marrakech 2024: Ghana’s Zinabu Issah wins gold in women’s discus throw
2 hours -
Our contract with GRA followed due process; ignore contrary reports – SML
2 hours -
SML is just Agyapa in suit and tie – Bright Simons
3 hours -
Domelevo condemns selection of KPMG to audit GRA/SML contract as illegal and unprofessional
3 hours -
SML/GRA contract: OSP should have released its report by now – Inusah Fuseini
4 hours -
KPMG report exonerates us – SML
4 hours -
Works and Housing Ministry seeks lasting solutions to challenges with stakeholders engagement
4 hours -
President’s statement on GRA-SML contract underlines Fourth Estate’s revelation – MFWA
4 hours -
Our services are one of a kind, not done by NPA – SML insists
4 hours