Why was a legal challenge filed?
President Peter Mutharika won a second term in May with 38.6% of the vote. But opposition candidates Lazarus Chakwera, who came second, and Saulos Chilima, who finished third, went to court to argue that the election was not fair. They said the way the election was conducted was full of irregularities. The judges, who arrived in court in the capital, Lilongwe, under military escort, upheld the complaint on Monday. According to the official results, Mr Chakwera, who claims he won the election, garnered 35.4% of the vote as the flag bearer for the Malawi Congress Party. Mr Chilima, a former ally of the president, got 20.2%. He was the candidate for the UTM. There is a high level of anxiety in the country following months of tense clashes between the police and opposition supporters. Many schools were closed and some public transport had been suspended ahead of Monday's court decision.What were the irregularities?
In court, lawyers for the losing candidates said that correction fluid - known by the brand name Tipp-Ex - had been used on some of the tallying forms sent in by polling stations. The changes were made after they had been signed by party agents, they said. The opposition alleges that there were irregularities at the polling centres where the votes were counted The lawyers also said that in some cases polling officials sent in the wrong copy of the results sheet to the main tallying centre. They also found some mathematical errors in a small number of cases. Though in each case there were not a huge number of errors, the lawyers said that the evidence pointed to a flawed process.What was the response?
The Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC) defended its handling of the vote as being in keeping with the law. It said that on the few forms where correction fluid had been found, it had not been used to change a result, but to alter procedural information that had been incorrectly entered. The commission said it had not supplied the Tipp-Ex. The MEC's lawyers also argued that while the wrong copy of the results sheet had been submitted in some cases, that copy had been signed off by party agents and the tally itself was correct. Outside the court proceedings, backers of Mr Mutharika's Democratic Progressive Party often mentioned reports of international observers, which were largely favourable, as evidence that he won the vote fairly.What sort of coverage was there in Malawi?
The court proceedings, which lasted more than three months, were keenly followed. Four radio stations broadcast the sessions live and on public transport passengers sometimes demanded that the radio be switched on so they could follow what was happening. Groups of people gathered round radio sets to hear the latest from the court.Why is it such a big deal?
The level of anger is unprecedented here. Since the disputed results were announced last May, there have been regular anti-government protests. Some of these have resulted in looting and the destruction of property, including government offices. Two people - one police officer and one civilian - are known to have been killed during the demonstrations. A human rights group held a rally in the capital after allegations were made that someone had attempted to bribe the judges Malawi's Human Rights Commission said that in October, during a security crackdown following a protest, police officers raped and sexually assaulted women, some of them in the presence of their children. Just a few days ago, the country's anti-corruption body arrested a top businessman on allegations that he attempted to bribe the five judges hearing the case. He allegedly wanted the judges to decide in favour of the respondents, Peter Mutharika and the Malawi Electoral Commission. The businessman was reported to the anti-corruption agency by the chief justice. The situation has not been helped by the fact that the police are not seen as neutral or professional. For the most part, it has been the military which has been going onto the streets to help bring order.DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Yaw Nsarkoh: Bit by bit we will understand China
4 hours -
Looted and returned: Asante royal artefacts on display for public viewing at Manhyia Museum
5 hours -
Suspected killer in Kasoa land dispute shooting not a National Security operative
5 hours -
Ghana appoint four Para Athletics coaches in Preparation for Paris 2024
5 hours -
Kumasi Cheshire Home decries inadequate equipment; seeks public support
6 hours -
UCL: Niclas Fullkrug hands Dortmund first leg advange over PSG
6 hours -
GPL: Accra Lions beat Hearts of Oak to go third
8 hours -
Seek higher grounds as rains intensify – GMet warns
8 hours -
May Day: Sam Ankrah promises to prioritise welfare and well-being of workers if elected president
8 hours -
Bawumia plans door-to-door campaign for 2024 polls
8 hours -
GAF condemns ‘unprovoked’ fatal shooting of soldier in Kasoa land dispute
9 hours -
OSP’s request for money laundering probe against Cecilia Dapaah baseless – AG advises EOCO
9 hours -
Obofour Raphael releases ‘Asem Yi Di Ka’ EP
9 hours -
‘Operation Clean Your Surroundings’: Popular Kenkey joint and public toilets in Takoradi shut down
10 hours -
GFA boss Kurt Okraku graces Dreams FC’s dinner to celebrate CAF Confederation Cup exploits
10 hours