The Fulton County, Georgia, judge overseeing the sprawling 2020 election interference racketeering case against former President Donald Trump and 18 co-defendants says that all proceedings in his courtroom related to the case will be livestreamed and allowed to be televised.
The ruling, however, would be subject to change and would not apply to any portions of the case moved to federal court.
In a court hearing Thursday, Superior Court of Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee, who was assigned the case, said he would make all hearings and possible trials available to be broadcast on the Fulton County Court YouTube channel.
McAfee also said that he will allow broadcast news media to have “pool” cameras, where groups of news organizations combine their resources and share camera access, in the courtroom.
Neither defense attorneys nor prosecutors appeared in court Thursday to oppose the news media’s request for cameras.
Thursday, McAfee also ruled to allow members of the media to use cell phones and computer electronics in the courtroom for non-recording purposes such as note-taking.
McAfee’s ruling is limited to the Fulton County state case.
Multiple defendants in Georgia’s sprawling state racketeering case, including former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark, are asking for their cases to be moved to federal court, where there are no cameras, computers or smartphones allowed in the court.
US District Judge Steve Jones could rule at any time on Meadows’ bid to move the Fulton County election subversion case to federal court, now that Meadows and the district attorney have filed dueling briefs weighing in on a follow-up legal question posed by the judge after Monday’s hearing on the matter.
Jones had specifically asked the parties whether the case should be moved if the court found that at least one of the episodes described in the racketeering case pertained to conduct Meadows carried out under the color of his federal office.
District Attorney Fani Willis argued in her new brief that such a finding would not be sufficient for the case to be moved. Meadows’ attorneys said it would.
Latest Stories
-
He’s the same old tried-and-failed Mahama, don’t be deceived by rebranding – Ahiagbah
2 mins -
John Frog: From child soldier to Afrobeats star
15 mins -
3rd African Media Convention ends with renewed spirit of unity and dedication
19 mins -
Nigeria’s Information Minister highlights Nigeria’s stride in press freedom at 3rd African Media Convention in Accra
37 mins -
ICT On Wheels: Students of Northern College of Science and Technology teach other students basic ICT skills
56 mins -
Champions Bayer Leverkusen become first German side to go a full season unbeaten
57 mins -
Sonko irked by ‘lasting’ stay of French troops in Senegal
1 hour -
South Africa ends rescue efforts at collapsed George building
1 hour -
Nigerian Central Bank intervention fails to stem naira slide
1 hour -
Husband sets 3-month deadline for his postpartum wife to lose 50 pounds
1 hour -
Late MP John Kumah laid to rest amid glowing tributes
1 hour -
Nigeria asks Senegal to mediate with junta-led states
2 hours -
Over-dependence on imports and low local content affecting exchange rate – Prof Bokpin
2 hours -
De Zerbi to leave Brighton after Man United clash
2 hours -
First Dep BoG Governor Dr Maxwell Opoku-Afari speaks on Ghana’s economic evolution and digital future
2 hours