Audio By Carbonatix
It seems that President Akufo-Addo's decision to withhold his signature from certain critical bills, including the 'Witchcraft' bill, has stirred discontent among some Members of Parliament.
Many of these lawmakers are calling for legal action against the President, arguing that his decision is unconstitutional.
Already, Ningo-Prampram MP, Samuel Nartey George, is urging Parliament to take the matter to the Supreme Court to compel President Akufo-Addo to sign those bills.
He believes that allowing this precedent to persist might set a troubling example for future presidents.
“Parliament must go to the Supreme Court to seek interpretations of Article 108. The President is not the ultimate in this country when it comes to the law. The Speaker has served notice that the President’s actions are unconstitutional and are a breach of the Constitution,” he said in an interview with Citi TV on Wednesday, December 6.
He emphasised that President Akufo-Addo should not be permitted to assume powers beyond his constitutional authority.
- Read also: Akufo-Addo’s refusal to sign bills a deliberate effort to frustrate Parliament’s work – Xavier Sosu
“I hold the view that the actions of the President are unconstitutional and even constitute grounds for impeachment. Because the President is flouting the Constitution in such a blatant manner. How can a witchcraft bill be interpreted by the President to be financial matters? And for those reasons, the President arrogates to himself powers that he doesn’t have.”
“He’s usurping the constitutional powers of the Speaker. We can’t sit down and allow that. I believe that if the President does not rescind his decisions, Parliament must take him to court. We should take him to the Supreme Court for the court to rule. The President has absolutely no powers under Article 108,” he added.
Madina MP, Francis Xavier Sosu, has accused President Akufo-Addo of attempting to obstruct the efforts of Parliament by declining to sign three bills passed by the House.
In his view, President Akufo-Addo is selectively interpreting Article 108 of the constitution for opportunistic reasons.
In July, Parliament approved the Armed Forces Bill, which aims to amend sections of Act 29 and the Armed Forces Act, 1962 (Act 105) to replace the Death Penalty with life imprisonment.
The Criminal Offences Amendment Bill 2023 also aims to prohibit the act of declaring, accusing, naming, or labelling an individual as a witch, among other related matters.
However, in a letter addressed to the Speaker of Parliament and read to the House on Monday, December 4, the President argued that the bills sponsored by the NDC MP for Madina, Francis-Xavier Sosu, must originate from the Executive and not as Private Members Bills.
Latest Stories
-
30 traditional medicine facilities shut down in Ashanti over regulatory breaches
1 minute -
AVSF raises alarm over surge in road crashes as nearly 90 victims recorded in one week
10 minutes -
John Boadu begins nationwide NPP tour to rally support for 2028 election bid
15 minutes -
GRA unveils customs border post at Antado, Cape Coast
23 minutes -
We will meet end-year revenue target – Finance Ministry assures
26 minutes -
After the floods comes super El Niño and potential droughts
31 minutes -
ISSER warns Ghana’s gold reserve strategy faces price risks
35 minutes -
Asanko Gold, GES collaborate to strengthen literacy and teacher capacity in Amansie
40 minutes -
Parliament approves landmark COCOBOD reforms to strengthen cocoa sector
42 minutes -
Building the Open Door: Why the African AI Revolution must belong to everyone
43 minutes -
AI is a tool for economic growth, not merely technological agenda – Deloitte Technology & Transformation Partner
50 minutes -
NCA extends 5G spectrum licence application deadline
53 minutes -
Court of Appeal adjourns Sedina Tamakloe stay application indefinitely
53 minutes -
Turning Ghanaian ambition into global opportunity: GHIB’s vision for the future
56 minutes -
Court of Appeal to seek Chief Justice’s warrant to sit during vacation for Tamakloe stay of execution ruling
60 minutes