https://www.myjoyonline.com/government-must-adopt-cost-efficient-approach-in-expanding-secondary-education-access-kofi-asare/-------https://www.myjoyonline.com/government-must-adopt-cost-efficient-approach-in-expanding-secondary-education-access-kofi-asare/
Executive Director of Africa Education Watch, Kofi Asare

The Executive Director of EduWatch Ghana, Kofi Asare, says government must adapt cost efficient methods in expanding access to secondary education in Ghana other than the boarding system if it is to reach universal secondary education by 2030.

According to him, calls for a cost-efficient new approach is not to hinder the government’s Free Senior High School policy, but rather a call to rethink the country’s unhealthy obsession towards the traditional boarding system which is far more expensive to manage.

He explained that due to the expensive boarding system at the secondary school level, whenever there is an attempt to expand access to secondary education, it negatively impacts the basic education system depriving the base of essential funds to operate.

Describing the relationship between secondary education and basic education as an inverse one, he noted that till a sustainable solution is reached, the quality of basic education in the country will suffer.

“Well, education is an input-output relationship, the quality of your input including of course supervision determines to a large extent, the quality of your output. And so if you invest little and you monitor or supervise poorly obviously you’ll churn out low quality.

“According to UNICEF for instance, only 7% of children in grade 3 can read grade appropriate text well in Ghana, so only 7% of children in grade 3 can read as expected of a grade 3 child in Ghana. It tells you that there are critical foundational issues,” he said on JoyNews’ PM Express.

Kofi Asare explained that the prevailing issues further buttress the point that there is a declining investment in basic education.

Speaking on findings from research conducted by his organization, he revealed that investment into basic education began decreasing from 2011.

“In 2011 for instance we were committing close to about half of the education budget to basic education, about 47% and it started declining since then. In 2012 we committed close to 8% of the GDP of Ghana to education that was when we were doing a lot… but the number of pupils has increased in line with population growth and the demand for education.

“Now if you look at the basic input indicators at the school level, we have huge infrastructure deficits. If the class room environment is not interesting, children will not be happy to learn. 40% of children in basic schools do not have access to desks, according to the Ministry of Education, that is not our data.

“When you have over 5000 of your basic schools taking place under trees and sheds and dilapidated structures where the slightest sight of rain means that school is closing down, it means that the school environment is not conducive for learning.”

He stated that while the national teacher-student ratio paints a rosy picture of 15 students to one teacher, suggesting a teacher surplus in the country, the situation on the ground is far from what is recorded.

“Apart from that there still are classrooms without teachers. Our research suggests that there are about 5000 primary school classrooms that do not have teachers in the deprived part of this country even though we seem to have a teacher surplus at the national level.

“If you look at pupil-teacher ratio data it looks so beautiful that almost every 15 students in Junior High School have one teacher. But there are schools that you’ll go you’ll see two teachers handling the whole Junior High School 1-3 so the input situation also has not been equitably distributed.”

He further stated that due to the insufficient investment into the basic and secondary education system, it has created an inverse relationship where often basic education suffers insufficient funding while government tries to improve secondary school access.

“So anytime you’re spending more on secondary, basic comes down and vice versa. That is why we are saying that this is not just about the free senior high school thing. In 2011 government was spending almost 3 times more on every secondary school child than basic education. So it is not that free senior high school has suddenly made secondary education expensive that is not the case.

“The point we’re making is that if we are to pursue the target of universal secondary education by 2030, we need to adapt cost efficient methods or approaches in expanding access to secondary education other than the boarding system where feeding alone is an albatross around government’s neck.

“And so we must begin to rethink the obsession towards this traditional boarding system which has made our secondary education system so expensive that anytime we attempt to expand access to secondary education it affects the raw material base that is basic education.”

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.


DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.