The Minority Caucus has also criticised what it describes as inadequate human rights protections in the Security and Intelligence Agencies Bill, 2025, cautioning that vague language in the draft law could be used to suppress legitimate civic activity.

The Caucus pointed to provisions framed broadly around protecting against activities intended to undermine the constitutional order.

According to the Minority, without precise definitions, such wording could be interpreted expansively to target lawful opposition, protest or activism.

“Although political neutrality is mentioned, there are no enforcement mechanisms or clear sanctions for breaches,” it stated.

The Minority also warned about the structure of Regional and District Security Councils, which are chaired by Regional Ministers and Metropolitan, Municipal and District Chief Executives.

It argued that the absence of cross-party representation creates a risk of politicisation, particularly during election periods.

“During sensitive periods, especially elections, such structures can be misused to suppress lawful political activity,” the Caucus cautioned.

On financial accountability, the Minority maintained that Parliament’s approval of intelligence funding must be matched with structured reporting mechanisms.

It argued that while the Auditor-General audits agency accounts, the Bill does not require detailed budget breakdowns or the publication of non-sensitive audit findings to enable effective oversight.

“Ghana needs a security framework that is strong and professional, but also accountable and firmly anchored in the Constitution,” the Minority stressed, reiterating its position that the Bill must be amended to safeguard civil liberties while strengthening national security.