Audio By Carbonatix
QUESTION ONE: Is a consensus necessary for an amendment referendum? Of course, it is. The framers of the Constitution underscored the need for a consensus when they set those very high thresholds of participation (40% of qualified voters) and concurrence (75% of voter cast) for the amendment motion. Truth is, whoever you are, you can't achieve these thresholds unless you secure a consensus.
QUESTION TWO: Is a referendum necessary even if we already have a consensus? I think so. This is because you can't amend the Constitution by just securing a consensus. You need a referendum in addition to consensus in order to carry an amendment through. You don’t only need a consensus before you amend, you need a referendum even if you already have a consensus. Consensus is fundamental.
PROBLEM: So, the problem with the President's conduct is not exactly the reason he gave for withdrawing the bills. The problems with his conduct are at least three. The first is his tardiness, both in realizing that there was no consensus and in giving his address last night.
The second is his failure, either by refusal or negligence, to consult frankly, openly and widely on the amendments. Yes, there were some forms of consultation. But it is one thing having a consultation and entirely another consulting frankly, openly and widely. From the fallout, it is obvious that frankness and openness were scarce commodities in his consultation department.
The third problem is the President's stern unwillingness, even after all the education we have given with our private resources on the matter, to separate the issue of partisan local government (which the people don't want) from the issue of MMDCE elections (which the people want badly and which he himself did promise the people).
Why did the President withdraw the bill for the election of MMDCEs too? Obviously, that unwillingness to separate the two issues, which from the word go was exceptionally deceptive and set the project up for failure, is not for lack of understanding of the law. It is a posturing which smacks somehow of bad faith. Simply put - if you won't give me what I want, then, you won't get what you want. That’s not cool.
Da yie!
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
African Forest Forum, AGRA and Ethiopian Forest Development push for deforestation-free trade and green jobs
16 minutes -
MoMo-to-Bank charge is not E-Levy in any form—Dafeamekpor
19 minutes -
Outstanding teacher and nurse arrears to be paid in four instalments – Controller and Accountant-General
23 minutes -
African Climate Foundation calls for Africa-led climate action amid growing climate threats
30 minutes -
Defection as a tool of conflict: Riyadh’s movements in Sudan come to light
34 minutes -
‘You are not refugees’ — Ablakwa outlines support ahead of Ghana evacuees’ arrival
35 minutes -
Dafeamekpor confirms Ohene Kwame Frimpong under fraud and money laundering investigation in Netherlands
39 minutes -
Bail application filed for detained MP Ohene Kwame Frimpong — Dafeamekpor
51 minutes -
Only Parliament can impose taxes and levies — Dafeamekpor
1 hour -
Mystic Twins Foundation continues to bring hope to marginalized communities
1 hour -
Dafeamekpor confirms NDC still pursuing election petition involving wife’s constituency
1 hour -
Dafeamekpor explains why he keeps family life private despite wife’s political career
1 hour -
Kwame Dadzie: Don’t spend government’s GH¢5 million to film sector
3 hours -
Former Accra Mayor Blankson endorses Wontumi for NPP national chairmanship
4 hours -
Eid festivals explained on Behind The Lens with Queen Liz
4 hours