Audio By Carbonatix
QUESTION ONE: Is a consensus necessary for an amendment referendum? Of course, it is. The framers of the Constitution underscored the need for a consensus when they set those very high thresholds of participation (40% of qualified voters) and concurrence (75% of voter cast) for the amendment motion. Truth is, whoever you are, you can't achieve these thresholds unless you secure a consensus.
QUESTION TWO: Is a referendum necessary even if we already have a consensus? I think so. This is because you can't amend the Constitution by just securing a consensus. You need a referendum in addition to consensus in order to carry an amendment through. You don’t only need a consensus before you amend, you need a referendum even if you already have a consensus. Consensus is fundamental.
PROBLEM: So, the problem with the President's conduct is not exactly the reason he gave for withdrawing the bills. The problems with his conduct are at least three. The first is his tardiness, both in realizing that there was no consensus and in giving his address last night.
The second is his failure, either by refusal or negligence, to consult frankly, openly and widely on the amendments. Yes, there were some forms of consultation. But it is one thing having a consultation and entirely another consulting frankly, openly and widely. From the fallout, it is obvious that frankness and openness were scarce commodities in his consultation department.
The third problem is the President's stern unwillingness, even after all the education we have given with our private resources on the matter, to separate the issue of partisan local government (which the people don't want) from the issue of MMDCE elections (which the people want badly and which he himself did promise the people).
Why did the President withdraw the bill for the election of MMDCEs too? Obviously, that unwillingness to separate the two issues, which from the word go was exceptionally deceptive and set the project up for failure, is not for lack of understanding of the law. It is a posturing which smacks somehow of bad faith. Simply put - if you won't give me what I want, then, you won't get what you want. That’s not cool.
Da yie!
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
DMU 002 train repaired after colliding with goat near Ashaiman
7 minutes -
Three remanded over alleged concealment of 869 cocaine slabs in gari
10 minutes -
Ernest Chemists mourns with Dagbon, donates GH¢70,000 to Palace
11 minutes -
Court turns down bail for alleged romance scam pastor
21 minutes -
Asokwa MCE links recent MoMo vendor attacks to Asafo Market decongestion
21 minutes -
Galamsey has polluted 60% of Ghana’s water bodies — CSIR-WRI scientist
23 minutes -
Criminal trials during legal vacations a ‘novel’ departure from tradition — Kpemka
24 minutes -
Nana B begins campaign tour in Ashanti region as he eyes NPP 1st Vice chair position
24 minutes -
CDD-Ghana calls for investigations into unresolved 2020 and 2024 election violence cases
25 minutes -
Communities applaud early gains under Damang Gold Mine Limited
34 minutes -
Cheddar’s application thrown out, High Court awards GH¢20,000 costs against him in Cola Holdings case
37 minutes -
Court gives Adu-Boahene, wife 6 days to secure lawyers or cross-examine witness themselves
39 minutes -
Investigate alleged US$1.7bn loss in connection with Gold Purchase Programme – Abena Osei Asare to Mahama
41 minutes -
Political parties, judiciary need reforms to protect African democracy — Asiedu Nketiah
43 minutes -
GAUA strike: NLC says administrators may have breached procedure for industrial action
44 minutes