Audio By Carbonatix
On May 2, 2025, the Governor of the Bank of Ghana gave the nation and the markets a message of confidence. He insisted that the stability of the cedi was not being propped up by intervention. “The stability you are seeing now, it’s not because we are intervening, it’s not because we are selling reserves for stability, no. Remember our reserves programme is actually going up by the day. We are building more and more reserves. All that we are doing is strengthening the surge in inflows, a number of foreign exchange market reforms are being implemented. It is the combination of all these factors,” he declared.
To investors and ordinary Ghanaians, the message was simple: the cedi was walking on its own feet, not leaning on the central bank’s crutches.
- slot pulsa
- situs slot 5000
- slot deposit 5000
- royalhoki77
- https://poolsafetygroup.com.au/what-we-do/
- https://patorama.com.au/helicopter-photography/
- https://reactmaintenancegroup.com.au/electrical-maintenance/
- https://www.100plumbing.com.au/work-with-us/
- slot maxwin
- https://finishingblade.ca/Banner/
- https://tubulousaustralia.com.au/gallery/
Fast forward to September 10, 2025, and the story shifted dramatically. The President announced: “The Bank of Ghana had been intervening in the forex market, but they have withdrawn.” In one sentence, the President undermined the narrative that had been carefully crafted just four months earlier. What was hailed as reform-driven strength in May was rebranded as intervention-driven illusion by September.
This contradiction is more than semantics. Currencies thrive on confidence, and confidence is built on consistency. If the central bank claimed to be building reserves while the presidency admitted those reserves were being used to intervene, then one of two things must be true: either the Governor misled the public, or the President revealed what the Governor was hiding. In both cases, credibility suffers, and when credibility falls, the cedi follows.
A cedi cannot have two birth certificates: one signed by reforms and another by interventions. Mixed signals don’t just confuse the public; they invite speculation, erode trust, and weaken the very foundation of stability. In currency markets, contradictions are costly. The cedi doesn’t just need reserves, it needs one honest story.
Author: Prof. Isaac Boadi, Dean, Faculty of Accounting and Finance, UPSA
Research Fellow, APL
Latest Stories
-
The World Cup and the new geography of belonging
11 minutes -
World Cup 2026: The Stars that were a kick away from a semi-final 16 years ago, arrive in USA not as standard-bearers
21 minutes -
Sky Train trial: $2m loss was caused by Covid-19, defence lawyers argue
33 minutes -
Petrol prices set for sharpest drop in months as fuel costs fall from June 16
40 minutes -
Vehicle pollution, a leading risk factor for death in Ghana both the children and working class
59 minutes -
GNFS intensifies fire prevention campaigns in Eastern Region
1 hour -
Presidency cuts political appointees by 124, but compensation bill jumps 148% and staff classifications raise questions
1 hour -
Retirees benefit from 7th health screening of Lordina Foundation
1 hour -
Sogakope residents storm ECG office over alleged overbilling, poor service delivery
1 hour -
BoG extends registration deadline for money transfer operators
1 hour -
Esiama Market to become commercial hub of Ellembelle – Kofi Buah
1 hour -
Black Stars to depart Rhode Island for Toronto today ahead of Panama clash on Wednesday
2 hours -
Wenchi 24-Hour Market project takes shape
2 hours -
Suaman MP urges NPP members to rally behind Dr Bawumia for victory 2028
2 hours -
Auditors’ Court to be established to prosecute audit offences – Ato Forson
2 hours