Audio By Carbonatix
Beginning next week, Twitter will add labels to the personal accounts of heads of state as it expands its policy on government-affiliated accounts, the company said Thursday.
The labels are meant to provide context for users to “have a more informed experience on Twitter,” according to a blog post from Twitter Support.
This appears to be a change from an earlier position when the company said it would not label the personal accounts of heads of state since such accounts already have “widespread name recognition, media attention, and public awareness.”
To continue to help you identify governmental officials and institutions on Twitter, we’re expanding our policy to label these accounts in more countries.
— Twitter Support (@TwitterSupport) February 11, 2021
Next week, you’ll start to see new profile labels on government accounts in 16 other countries.https://t.co/RNyrznKQuL pic.twitter.com/poK4vIa5xZ
Twitter said it will also update the text in its labels to add more specificity and will apply additional labels to state-affiliated media accounts in the coming months.
The company has stopped amplifying tweets from accounts where a government “exercises control over editorial content through financial resources, direct or indirect political pressures, and/or control over production and distribution.”
That doesn’t include news outlets that receive government funding but which have editorial independence.
In August, Twitter began applying labels to government officials’ accounts to more clearly identify them for users.
It started with government officials in China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US, and is adding Canada, Cuba, Ecuador, Egypt, Germany, Honduras, Indonesia, Iran, Italy, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Spain, Thailand, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates beginning on February 17th.
Twitter declined to comment Thursday about whether it would apply additional protections to personal accounts of heads of state, but such protections apparently do exist.
In July, the accounts of dozens of companies and high-profile individuals were compromised during a massive breach that was part of a bitcoin-promoting scam, but the (now-banned) account of then-President Trump was unaffected.
It turned out that Trump’s account enjoyed additional protections after “past incidents.”
Trump was permanently banned from Twitter in January for inciting the deadly attack on the Capitol.
Latest Stories
-
Suspected armed robber dies from gunshot wound after snatching a taxi at La
17 minutes -
2026 World Cup: Vinicius Jr rescues draw as Brazil come from behind
1 hour -
Six arrested as security forces crack down on defiant China Mall project
3 hours -
Qatar stun Switzerland to snatch first-ever World Cup point
3 hours -
Kidnapped Nigerian retired general dies in captivity
4 hours -
Trump says US-Iran deal to be signed on Sunday as Tehran casts doubt on timing
4 hours -
2026 World Cup: Sports Ministry demands FIFA intervention over Partey’s visa denial
5 hours -
Three killed, three injured in Yikurigu crash involving Yutong VVIP bus and Toyota Sienna
6 hours -
Child labour surges in Ada East District – Social Welfare Director
7 hours -
Let Love Lead NGO mobilises 3,000 volunteers for Nima sanitation drive to prevent flooding
7 hours -
High Court quashes GTEC directive derecognising UNEM degrees
8 hours -
Family demands independent probe into disappearance of newborn baby at Salaga Hospital
8 hours -
Al Qaeda-linked militants curb their brutality in seized Malian territory
8 hours -
Photos: How Accra West uses ‘aboboyaa’ to transport waste on muddy roads to McCarthy Hills dumpsite
9 hours -
Yaya Touré seals surprise new job with Champions League club
9 hours