Private Legal Practitioner, Justin Pwavra Teriwajah has said that Sections 207 and 208 of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29), should not be misconstrued as the creeping back into the country’s jurisprudence, by the repealed Criminal Libel Law.
According to him, Sections 207 and 208, and the criminal libel law are very much different in terms of purpose and application.
Speaking on JoyNews’ The Law, he noted that whereas the Criminal Libel Law was purposely meant to protect public office holders from libel and defamatory comments, Sections 207 and 208 applies to all and sundry.
He said, “The repealed provisions clearly concerned libel, and I can read the definition of defamatory matter in Section 114, Sub-section 1 of the repealed provision, it says a matter is defamatory which impugns to a person, any crime or misconduct in any public office, or which is likely to injure him in his occupation, calling or office, or to expose him to general hatred, contempt or ridicule.”
Citing a decided case, he added, “So even in that particular case of the Republic vs Thompson Books limited, the issue was Nana Konadu Agyeman Rawlings was the first lady back then, and there was a defamatory matter published against her for which reason the Thompson Books Limited among others were being prosecuted. Now the matter went to Supreme Court and the issue was whether Nana Konadu Agyeman Rawlings qualified as a public officer.”
According to him, should the Criminal Libel Law still be in force now, it would most likely be used to protect the President, but Sections 207 and 208 can be used to protect the ordinary Ghanaian.
“So when you look at it clearly, the Criminal Libel Law had a particular objective and focus, which is clearly missing in Sections 207 and 208. Now the President as we speak today, is the number one public officer, so if the Criminal Libel Law were still in force, then clearly, that could have been used to protect him.
“But the provisions that we are talking about today, Sections 207 and 208, there is no requirement of protection of a public officer from being defamed. So in the first place clearly, when you compare the two, there is a very clear difference.
“One clearly concerns the defamation of a public officer, this one is a general law that can protect any Ghanaian. And for me, I don’t see Sections 207 and 208 as necessarily being about defamation and libel and things like that,” he explained.
Latest Stories
-
“Such a time as this” A man for the times; a man for the moment
3 mins -
IMANI’s PULSE Reports: Bawumia’s stance on LGBTQ+ boosts positive sentiments towards his person
23 mins -
19-year-old shop attendant convicted for stealing an iPhone
29 mins -
Tamale nurse who poured boiling water on husband jailed 6 years
50 mins -
Teacher unions call for total overhaul of SSNIT’s management to avert possible collapse of the scheme
57 mins -
Ejisu: Government officials engaging in vote-buying in Bonwire – Kwabena Aduomi’s aide alleges
1 hour -
Europe Presbytery of PCG donates clinic to Nsaba PRESEC
2 hours -
Korle Bu clarifies reports on cancellation of surgeries
2 hours -
Let’s use film for public education – Ken Fiati
2 hours -
Private schools threaten to boycott BECE, WASSCE over exorbitant charges by WAEC
2 hours -
Enyonam Manye appointed ambassador for CASTNET International Chamber of Commerce; Named among top agric influencers in Africa
2 hours -
The Myth of The Sword of Damocles and Speaker Alban Bagbin’s Pandora Box
2 hours -
2024 polls: Let’s continue to unite in peace – Bawumia to politicians
2 hours -
Patronise local movies to push industry growth – Fella Makafui to public
2 hours -
King Charles visits cancer centre as public engagements resume
2 hours