A former justice of the Supreme Court, William Atuguba, has attributed the increasing decline in the public’s trust in the judiciary to a constitutional problem.
Speaking on JoyNews’ Upfront, Justice Atuguba said the problem stems from the appointment process - explaining that the Judicial Council, charged with the responsibility to appoint judges, has presidential nominees join in their deliberations.
This, he contended, could raise questions about the autonomy of the judiciary and whether political influence plays a role in judicial appointments.
“You want the judiciary to be independent, the Constitution states so. Nonetheless, on the Judicial Council, which recommends Justices to be appointed, you have the Attorney General and four nominees of the president sitting there taking part in the proceedings as to who should be presented for appointment to the Supreme Court.”
“Where is the independence of the judiciary? We have the executive so strongly present there?” Justice Atuguba quizzed.
He scrutinised the composition of the Judicial Council noting that the current structure does not discourage political influence.
“The present structure of the Judicial Council, has the Chief Justice as chairman, a representative of the Supreme Court and the various other lower courts (Appeals Court, High Court, etc), the Judge Advocate General from the Armed Forces, the director of the Police Legal Directorate, editor of the law reports, two members of the bar association, and then the four presidential nominees and the Attorney General.”
“Now, if you look at it realistically, who can stand up to a Chief Justice who wants to do the president's bidding? I mean, just for the sake of argument, who can stand up? Is it the Attorney General and the four nominees? They will certainly try to push for the president, isn't it?”
Furthermore, he acknowledged the potential sway of other Council members, including those from the Ghana Bar Association, who might align their decisions with personal inclinations.
“Then the representative of the Supreme Court, it also depends on how he stands in relation to the Chief Justice. If he's not independent-minded, he may always like to side with the Chief Justice,” he said adding that other representatives of the courts may also side with the Chief Justice too.
The former Supreme Court Judge advocated for a change in the composition of the Judicial Council.
He emphasised the need to remove executive members from the Council to ensure its independence in executing its duties.
“In the separation of powers, the executive should be separate from the judicial arm so that they are independent and can do their work freely. Then you bring them there to police their appointments from the beginning? Is that how to achieve an independent judiciary?”
Latest Stories
-
Rheumatologist sheds light on hidden challenges persons living with lupus face
2 hours -
Ghana, Nigeria and the quest for UK looted treasure
2 hours -
Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, says Nigeria is ‘my country’ on visit with Prince Harry
3 hours -
Man who received first pig kidney transplant dies
3 hours -
Akufo-Addo pays tribute at funeral of late former DCE and chief of Binaba
3 hours -
Afronita hopeful of making it to Britain’s Got Talent semi-finals
3 hours -
Oprah Winfrey speaks of ‘biggest regret’ as she opens up about weight loss struggles
3 hours -
Arsenal beat Man Utd to return top and keep title race alive
3 hours -
Djokovic greets fans with a helmet after being hit by bottle
4 hours -
Leverkusen beat Bochum to go 50 games unbeaten
4 hours -
How Kendrick Lamar and Drake changed rap beefs forever
4 hours -
Harry and Meghan visit Lagos school on final day of Nigeria tour
4 hours -
World’s top coffee, soy and sugar supplier Brazil wants to rule cocoa, too
4 hours -
Yaw Nsarkoh: I remember Paulin Hountondji…
4 hours -
Inspiring Love Story: How Otumfuo Osei Tutu II and adorable Lady Julia first met; 6 lessons learnt
4 hours