Audio By Carbonatix
Former First Deputy Speaker of Parliament, Joseph Osei-Owusu, has stated that facilitating the work of parliament financially to enable its members carry out their work should not be considered corruption.
He said in most cases, budgets for parliamentary work so delay that if committees were to await the releases before getting work done, nothing may be done at the end of the day, which may also disadvantage people seeking public services.
He therefore dismissed suggestions that money paid by the Executive to members of Parliament's Appointments Committee after they vet nominees, constitute bribery and corruption.
He explained that Members of Parliament require funds to fuel their vehicles and cover other expenses to be present in the chamber or at committee sittings to perform their duties. Therefore, if there is ever a shortfall in funding from Parliament’s administration, external support is acceptable to help them carry out their work.
He said, “When committees need to work on reports for agencies, and Parliament has no funds, why should I use my own vehicle and fuel to carry out the work of the agency? Either you facilitate this, or you wait until Parliament is able to release money. If this is what you call corruption, then you clearly misunderstand what it means to work for the government.”
Mr Osei-Owusu was speaking on the Super Morning Show on Joy FM on Thursday, January 30, while discussing allegations of bribery against parliamentarians.
The former Bekwai MP also revealed that, during his time in Parliament, the Chief of Staff ever provided them facilitation after completing certain duties.
Read also: Chief of Staff gave us money after vetting, but it’s not bribery’ – Joseph Osei-Owusu
His comments follow an allegation made by a youth activist Oliver Barker-Vormawor, who claimed that members of Parliament’s Appointment Committee were accepting money from ministerial nominees before approving them after their vetting.
Although Mr. Barker-Vormawor later appeared before Parliament to apologise and retract the allegation, the issue has remained on the front burner, sparking public debate over whether it is acceptable for Members of Parliament to receive money for performing their duties, aside from their official salaries and allowances.
Listen to Joe Osei-Owusu argue his point in the video below. Private legal practitioners Samson Lardy Anyenini and Martin Kpebu, who were part of the discussion, rejected Osei-Owusu's position.
Read also: Bribery allegations are nothing new, but no proof exists’ – Deputy Minority Leader
Latest Stories
-
Tema Fire Commander calls for private-sector support
5 minutes -
Adaklu is not a safe haven for environmental degradation – DCE
9 minutes -
Judiciary urged to expedite corruption cases
13 minutes -
Adenta-Accra travel time improves significantly under contra-flow – GAPTE
17 minutes -
SEND-Ghana, UCC students march for mandatory food warning labels
24 minutes -
Auditor-General vows tough surcharges, unveils tracker, AI audits
30 minutes -
Government vows no political protection for drug trafficking suspects
41 minutes -
Government clarifies Interior Minister’s ‘involvement’ comment in drug probe
1 hour -
Mahama orders security agencies to make Ghana’s ports ‘ironclad’ against drug trafficking
1 hour -
Government admits turf war among security agencies is undermining port security
2 hours -
Government rejects ‘Cocaine Coast’ label, says drug busts show security agencies are working
2 hours -
Banks NPL ratio of 16.1% is still too high – S&P
2 hours -
US death row inmate Christa Pike taken to hospital after surviving two lethal injections, says lawyer
2 hours -
Japan raises residency fee for foreign nationals by twenty-fold
2 hours -
Nollywood actor CJay Nwoks dies in Lagos hospital
3 hours