Audio By Carbonatix
Private legal practitioner Thaddeus Sory has strongly criticised the actions of the Special Prosecutor (SP) and Parliament in their handling of the pursuit of former Finance Minister Ken Ofori-Atta.
Sory, in an opinion piece, questioned the fairness of SP Kissi Agyebeng’s conduct in declaring Ofori-Atta a fugitive from justice and labelling security officials who invaded his home as rogues, as well as the necessity of Parliament’s involvement in the matter.
At the core of Sory’s argument is the fundamental principle of justice that no individual should be judged without first being heard.
He says this principle, deeply rooted in natural law, was demonstrated even in biblical accounts where Adam was given the opportunity to explain himself before facing consequences.
Sory disagreed with the SP’s approach to the case, particularly in branding the actions of certain state officials who entered the former Minister’s residence as “roguish.”
According to him, the SP acknowledged that these individuals were state officials carrying out their official duties, yet failed to seek an explanation before condemning them.
He questioned the authority of the SP to determine the lawfulness of other officials’ actions, arguing that such judgments should be based on established legal procedures rather than personal assessments.
Furthermore, Sory criticized the Special Prosecutor’s handling of the case, stating that if there were sufficient grounds for prosecuting Ken Ofori-Atta, the appropriate legal processes should be followed rather than issuing repeated public statements.
He suggested that Kissi Agyebeng’s actions amounted to grandstanding, wasting valuable time and resources while failing to produce tangible results.
In addition to faulting the SP, Sory took issue with Parliament’s involvement in the matter and questioned why Parliament found it necessary to apologise to Ofori-Atta in this particular case when similar considerations were not extended to other individuals who have faced questionable treatment by security agencies.
He challenged whether the former Minister had any special immunity that warranted parliamentary scrutiny over his investigation.
Sory, drawing from his own experiences as a legal practitioner, emphasised the importance of allowing law enforcement agencies to carry out their work without unnecessary public commentary or political interference.
He urged all stakeholders to adhere to the principle of fairness, ensuring that every individual under investigation is given the opportunity to respond before any conclusions are drawn.
Read Thaddeus Sory's full opinion here.
Suggested:
Latest Stories
-
Vudumane out with latest single ‘Love No Dey’
19 minutes -
Health advocates call for nationwide HPV Vaccination for boys
24 minutes -
Pope Leo to tour four African countries in first major overseas trip of 2026
27 minutes -
Full text: Finance Minister presents Ghana Accelerated National Reserve Accumulation Policy
47 minutes -
Rev Opuni-Frimpong calls for national dialogue on rising SHS indiscipline
50 minutes -
Kumasi prodigy wins National Spelling Bee with ‘breviloquent’
55 minutes -
Gov’t to purchase 3 tonnes of gold weekly in push for 15-month import cover – Ato Forson
1 hour -
The psychology behind scams: Why smart people get tricked
1 hour -
Clean Energy Chamber calls for lower import duties on EVs and components for local assembly
1 hour -
Communications Minister launches committee to safeguard sustainability of DTT platform
1 hour -
Cambridge conference spotlights future-ready education in Africa
1 hour -
Sam George calls for trust-driven, inclusive banking at Connected Banking Summit
1 hour -
Ghana targets 15-month import buffer with GANRAP
1 hour -
Ghana’s democracy is speaking; Are we listening?
1 hour -
Government targets 127 tonnes of small-scale gold yearly under new reserves policy
2 hours
