Audio By Carbonatix
The reintroduction of the controversial anti-LBGTQ bill in Parliament has suffered a setback after it was quietly removed from Wednesday’s Order Paper.
The bill, officially known as the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, had been listed for consideration on Tuesday, October 21, but was absent from the business agenda the following day.
Explaining the development on the floor of Parliament, Majority Leader Mahama Ayariga said there was no need to re-lay the bill since it had already been passed by the previous Parliament and sent to the Presidency for assent.
“We indicated that we thought the bills had been passed by this house already and had been sent to the presidency for assent. And so, we didn’t see the need to reconsider a bill that has already been passed by this house, waiting for presidential assent,” he told the House.
Ayariga noted that unless the constitutional procedure for returning a bill to Parliament is triggered by the President, the House has no business debating it again.
“Unless the constitutional procedure for returning the bill to us is complied with by the president for us to reconsider and then use our two-thirds majority to approve the bill, even if the presidency had some issues with it, there’s no need to relist it,” he explained.
According to the Majority Leader, the Speaker subsequently instructed the Clerk of Parliament to reconsider his action, which led to the removal of the bill from the Order Paper.
The development has stirred renewed debate over the fate of the anti-LBGTQ bill, with some legal experts arguing that bills that are not assented to before the end of a parliamentary session may have to be re-laid.
Others, however, believe the legislation remains valid until the President formally returns it to the House.
The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, widely referred to as the “anti-LGBTQ bill,” has been one of the most hotly debated pieces of legislation in recent years. It seeks to criminalise same-sex relationships and advocacy for LGBTQ rights in Ghana.
Its removal from Wednesday’s Order Paper raises fresh uncertainty about when — or if — the bill will receive presidential assent.
Latest Stories
-
Ghanaian community in Switzerland champions inclusive governance at Diaspora Dialogue Series
1 minute -
UN slavery resolution isn’t binding, but revives calls for reparations – Prof Appiagyei-Atua
5 minutes -
Ablakwa expresses deep gratitude to UN member states for backing Ghana’s slavery resolution
9 minutes -
Gender Minister engages management, introduces new Chief Director at MoGCSP
16 minutes -
Last Gallop: The rise, fall and fight for Horse Racing in Ghana
19 minutes -
Communications Minister launches Ghana Climate Atlas to strengthen planning and climate resilience
21 minutes -
Maintain credibility, reduce commentary — NDC elections director advises Mussa Dankwah
27 minutes -
NDPC urges time discipline and stronger systems to accelerate Ghana’s development
28 minutes -
AU’s legal path to UN slavery resolution not strong enough – Prof Appiagyei-Atua
30 minutes -
Ghana Boundary Commission flags damaged pillars and development gaps in Bono Border communities
33 minutes -
Enforcing UN slavery resolution will be difficult — Prof Appiagyei-Atua
35 minutes -
Ghana, UK deepen education ties as Haruna Iddrisu meets British High Commissioner
36 minutes -
Students urged to lead climate action through Ghana Green Scholars Programme
40 minutes -
IMANI Brief: When service to nation becomes opportunities for sale
46 minutes -
‘We want to make a statement’ – Semenyo on Austria friendly
54 minutes
