Audio By Carbonatix
Colorado's Supreme Court has removed Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential ballot, citing an insurrection clause in the US Constitution.
In a landmark decision that upends the White House race, the court ruled 4-3 that Mr Trump is not an eligible candidate because of section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
But the decision has been placed on hold pending appeal next month.
Several attempts to kick Mr Trump off the ballot in other states have failed.
Tuesday's decision does not apply to states outside of Colorado.
The top court wrote in its ruling: "We do not reach these conclusions lightly. We are mindful of the magnitude and weight of the questions now before us.
"We are likewise mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach."
The decision reverses an earlier one from a Colorado judge, who ruled that the 14th Amendment's insurrection ban did not apply to presidents because the section does not explicitly name them.
That same lower court judge also found that Mr Trump had participated in an insurrection on the day of the US Capitol riot in 2021 when supporters of his stormed Congress as lawmakers were certifying President Joe Biden's election victory.
The Colorado Supreme Court's decision does not go into effect until at least 4 January 2024. That is the eve of the deadline for the state to print its presidential primary ballots.
In a statement, Steven Cheung, a spokesman for the Trump campaign, called the ruling "completely flawed" and lambasted the justices, who were all appointed by Democratic governors.
"Democrat Party leaders are in a state of paranoia over the growing, dominant lead President Trump has amassed in the polls," Mr Cheung said.
"They have lost faith in the failed Biden presidency and are now doing everything they can to stop the American voters from throwing them out of office next November."
Mr Cheung added that Mr Trump's legal team would "swiftly file an appeal" to the US Supreme Court.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a watchdog group that brought the case, welcomed the ruling.
"It is not only historic and justified, but is necessary to protect the future of democracy in our country," the group's president, Noah Bookbinder, said in a statement.
Similar lawsuits in New Hampshire, Minnesota and Michigan have failed.
The 14th Amendment was ratified after the American Civil War. Its Section 3 was intended to block secessionists from returning to previous government roles once southern states re-joined the Union.
It was used against Confederate president Jefferson Davis and his vice-president Alexander Stephens, both of whom had served in Congress, but has seldom been invoked since.
Latest Stories
-
Akosua Manu refutes Kennedy Agyapong; Bawumia campaigned for NPP in Adenta
4 minutes -
Government’s reset agenda will take time to materialise – Ho Central MP
4 minutes -
Police seize over 1,600 parcels of suspected narcotic drugs in major bust
6 minutes -
Miguel Ribeiro Fiifi Brandful
7 minutes -
Trade Minister storms Abossey Okai to enforce fair pricing ,curb middlemen exploitation
12 minutes -
Hopeson Adorye calls for firm action against GWCL over persistent water shortages
21 minutes -
Two burnt to death in fiery Offinso road accident
42 minutes -
NPP flatly rejects Frimpong-Boateng’s claims, defends 2024 flagbearer vote
60 minutes -
NPP initiates process to expel Prof Frimpong-Boateng over “fake party” comments
1 hour -
Family of late Sawla-Tuna-Kalba MP appeals to President Mahama over GH¢944,955 demand blocking his burial
2 hours -
Today’s Front pages: Tuesday, January 13, 2026
2 hours -
Galamsey fight: Western Regional Minister calls for real-time monitoring of water bodies
2 hours -
NPP has lost its identity, the current party is “fake” – Prof Frimpong-Boateng
3 hours -
GRA targets GH¢225bn revenue in 2026 as VAT reforms take effect
3 hours -
Heath Goldfields promises community-centered revival of Bogoso-Prestea Mine
3 hours
