A Senior Programmes Officer, Human Rights and Social Inclusion at the Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), Michael Augustus Akagbor, has questioned Ghana’s negotiating power on the international stage as the contemplates the passage of a new anti-gay bill.
Speaking on JoyNews’ PM Express on Tuesday, he explained the need for Ghana to assess its position and influence on the global level before making certain decisions.
His comments comes after the US Ambassador to Ghana, Virginia Palmer, said Ghana would face severe economic challenges should the bill banning lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (LGBTQ+) activities be passed.
However, proponents of the Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill highlighted the hypocrisy on the part of the United States of America, noting that the USA still trades with Saudi Arabia despite their stringent laws against the practice of LGBTQ+.
In response, Mr Akagbor stated that there is a stark contrast between Ghana and global giants like Saudi Arabia.
Citing an example, he said, “Saudi Arabia could decide today to say, ‘we are going to cut back on how much oil we produce’ and the whole world will feel the pinch.
“Can we do same in Ghana?” he quizzed.
The Programmes Officer further cautioned against misleading comparisons, drawing attention to the economic impact that Uganda suffered after going ahead to pass one of the strictest anti-gay laws in recent times.
"Last year, we had $800 million from AGOA [African Growth and Opportunity Act], we have projected $800 million for next year and 2025. So we tend to lose $1.6 billion of the AGOA transaction and that will be a huge money to lose," he said.
He highlighted the differences between Ghana’s practice of democracy and Saudi Arabia’s theocratic system.
This distinction, according to him, is crucial especially when evaluating how each nation manages itself and engages in international discourse.
The MP for Ningo-Prampram, Sam George who is a major advocate of the anti-LGBTQ bill maintained that Ghana would lose nothing should the USA decide to cut business after the passage of the bill into law.
According to him, the US benefited more from trade relations with Ghana therefore any such legislation to end trade was to their disadvantage.
Latest Stories
-
Samson’s Take: Arrogance of Power, Shameful Policing
7 hours -
Burnley score late to draw with Manchester United at Old Trafford
9 hours -
Bayer Leverkusen extend unbeaten run to 46 games after draw with Stuttgart
9 hours -
Chelsea come from two goals down to draw against Aston Villa
9 hours -
Andre Ayew scores in Le Havre’s 3-3 draw with PSG
9 hours -
GPL 2023/24: Kotoko draw with Medeama; Samartex go 7 points clear of Nations FC
9 hours -
Mahama cuts sod for construction of new multipurpose Jakpa palace in Damongo
10 hours -
NSS management assists Papao fire victims
10 hours -
EXPLAINER: Will dumsor end soon?
11 hours -
IMANI Africa takes on EC, accuses it of lying and publishing half truths
12 hours -
Manasseh Azure calls for investigation and prosecution of those responsible for GRA/SML contract
12 hours -
Kwesi Atuahene: Ghana’s health capital depends on HealthTech – Africa Center for Digital Transformation
12 hours -
13 signs your wife is planning on leaving you and you have no idea
12 hours -
IMANI Africa: Ghana’s EC’s dangerous and pathological conduct
13 hours -
If I speak there will be fire – Salah on Klopp row
13 hours