Audio By Carbonatix
Professor of Finance at the University of Ghana, Godfred Bokpin, has said Ghana’s delayed decision to seek support from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) significantly worsened the country’s economic crisis and led to one of the most expensive IMF programmes in the nation’s history.
Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile on Saturday, May 16, Prof Bokpin said the previous government missed the right timing to approach the IMF, forcing the country into a more difficult and costly recovery path.
According to him, Ghana’s economic conditions by the third quarter of 2021 clearly showed the need for IMF intervention, but the previous goverment delayed action until the economy had deteriorated significantly.
He said countries such as Kenya acted earlier under similar economic circumstances and were able to avoid some of the severe measures Ghana later had to implement.
“The current programme that we are on, it is our considered view and we said this before that if the government had shown a little more proactiveness in reaching out to the IMF, we could have avoided domestic debt,” he said.
“We were almost at the same economic fundamentals as Kenya. Kenya went in for a programme, but we delayed and that worsened the economic fundamentals. Eventually, we had to go for perhaps the most pricey IMF programme in all our history,” he added.
He explained that the burden of the programme had gone beyond ordinary fiscal adjustments, with citizens bearing the cost through the Domestic Debt Exchange Programme (DDEP), expenditure rationalisation and the financial strain on public institutions, including the Bank of Ghana.
“If you look at the price that we have had to pay for these gains, it will take us years to recover, essentially, from the price we have had to pay,” he added.
Professor Bokpin also raised concerns over the financial losses reported by the Bank of Ghana, saying the issue remained unresolved despite recent clarifications by government and IMF officials.
He noted that while central banks are not necessarily profit-making institutions, the cost of their policy decisions must be assessed carefully, especially where those losses eventually become a burden on the public purse.
According to him, the recapitalisation of the Bank of Ghana means taxpayers will ultimately absorb the losses, making the issue one of national concern.
Latest Stories
-
PURC, ECG and GRIDCo align plans to ensure stable power supply during 2026 FIFA World Cup
40 minutes -
Ghana launches National Shea Commodity Platform to commercialise shea production
51 minutes -
Bawumia holds talks with British High Commissioner in Accra
55 minutes -
AFF study documents 115 edible forest species and indigenous knowledge in biodiversity hotspot
55 minutes -
MPs partner with Afarinick to boost Ghana’s cocoa production capacity
1 hour -
Where are the jobs?- Sammy Awuku questions government
1 hour -
Ghana needs effective solutions to rising unemployment, not slogans – Oppong Nkrumah
1 hour -
Oppong Nkrumah calls for overhaul of Ghana’s youth employment strategy
1 hour -
Minnesota attacker pleads guilty in killing of lawmaker and husband, avoids death penalty
1 hour -
When does personal conduct become institutional responsibility? The GES debate explained
1 hour -
Scientific consensus calls for wildlife protection to be integrated into global climate change policy
2 hours -
Seequent turning old data into the new mining edge
2 hours -
NPA receives ultra-modern tanker drivers’ rest stop at BOST Kumasi depot
2 hours -
Toronto police officer dies in raid linked to US consulate shooting
2 hours -
Black Sherif and how to listen to Ghanaian pop
2 hours