Audio By Carbonatix
Professor of Finance at the University of Ghana, Godfred Bokpin, has said Ghana’s delayed decision to seek support from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) significantly worsened the country’s economic crisis and led to one of the most expensive IMF programmes in the nation’s history.
Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile on Saturday, May 16, Prof Bokpin said the previous government missed the right timing to approach the IMF, forcing the country into a more difficult and costly recovery path.
According to him, Ghana’s economic conditions by the third quarter of 2021 clearly showed the need for IMF intervention, but the previous goverment delayed action until the economy had deteriorated significantly.
He said countries such as Kenya acted earlier under similar economic circumstances and were able to avoid some of the severe measures Ghana later had to implement.
“The current programme that we are on, it is our considered view and we said this before that if the government had shown a little more proactiveness in reaching out to the IMF, we could have avoided domestic debt,” he said.
“We were almost at the same economic fundamentals as Kenya. Kenya went in for a programme, but we delayed and that worsened the economic fundamentals. Eventually, we had to go for perhaps the most pricey IMF programme in all our history,” he added.
He explained that the burden of the programme had gone beyond ordinary fiscal adjustments, with citizens bearing the cost through the Domestic Debt Exchange Programme (DDEP), expenditure rationalisation and the financial strain on public institutions, including the Bank of Ghana.
“If you look at the price that we have had to pay for these gains, it will take us years to recover, essentially, from the price we have had to pay,” he added.
Professor Bokpin also raised concerns over the financial losses reported by the Bank of Ghana, saying the issue remained unresolved despite recent clarifications by government and IMF officials.
He noted that while central banks are not necessarily profit-making institutions, the cost of their policy decisions must be assessed carefully, especially where those losses eventually become a burden on the public purse.
According to him, the recapitalisation of the Bank of Ghana means taxpayers will ultimately absorb the losses, making the issue one of national concern.
Latest Stories
-
IMF gains should not celebrated yet – Kofi Bentil
3 minutes -
Ghana still addicted IMF programmes that don’t promote production – Dr Nyarko Otoo
6 minutes -
IMF exit marks end of painful economic chapter – Dr. Theo Acheampong
27 minutes -
Franklin Cudjoe: Mahama gov’ delivered Ghana’s fastest economic recovery
38 minutes -
Ghana paid high price for delayed IMF programme – Prof Bokpin
50 minutes -
Government commits to fully recapitalising Bank of Ghana by 2032
1 hour -
The football culture: lost or simply changed?
1 hour -
African Athletics Championships: Ghana’s women’s relay team makes history with bronze medal
2 hours -
Ghana must seize hard-won fiscal space to drive growth, jobs – IMF
2 hours -
Black Queens’ Mary Amponsah donates to lower division side Blacoe Soccer Queens
2 hours -
10 miners rescued after pit collapse at Konongo mining site
2 hours -
“Don’t let power intoxicate you” – Kojo Adu Asare fires warning to “wicked” appointees
4 hours -
The status of the Ghana Law School Entrance Exams and current routes to being a lawyer
5 hours -
How pension funds can solve Ghana’s university hostel crisis
6 hours -
Abu Trica released after meeting bail conditions
7 hours