Audio By Carbonatix
Energy Minister John Abdulai Jinapor has cast doubt on the transparency of the Gold-for-Oil (G4O) programme, stating that the initiative is riddled with opacity and lacks the necessary clarity for effective continuation.
Speaking on Joy News’ PM Express on Tuesday, February 4, he stated that the current system is deeply flawed and will be replaced with a more transparent alternative.
“There’s a high level of opacity, and the clarity is not there,” he stated emphatically.
“The Auditor General has flagged it. So it’s not just what we are saying—it is a fact. The reality is that we are reforming all this because of the high level of opacity.
"If it were that clear, and was that transparent, and you could see everything easily, then you would not even need the reforms we are pursuing.”
The Gold-for-Oil programme, which was introduced as a means to leverage the country’s gold reserves in exchange for petroleum products, has come under intense scrutiny.
Critics have repeatedly questioned the programme’s operational framework, citing the lack of publicly available information on key transactions and the selection process for participating companies.
The Auditor General’s report, which flagged several irregularities in the programme, has further fueled calls for reform.
Mr. Jinapor’s statements signal a clear intent by the new administration to overhaul the existing structure and introduce a more accountable and transparent alternative.
The Minister argued that accessing relevant information about the deals, particularly those involving offshore companies, has proven difficult.
“We are pursuing these reforms because of the opacity and the lack of clarity,” he explained.
“It is difficult to get information, even in respect of offshore and all these companies that are dealt with. The criteria for even selecting the companies is not clear-cut. So clearly, there’s a problem—that is why we want to reform.”
When asked whether the current administration plans to maintain the Gold-for-Oil programme in the interim, Mr. Jinapor was unequivocal in his response: “No, we will replace it with a better programme. The current Gold-for-Oil programme we’ve inherited—we will discontinue.”
He, however, acknowledged that dismantling the system would take some time, as establishing a new framework requires parliamentary approval and extensive legal groundwork.
“You need some time to put a workable system in place,” he noted. “If you want to set up a new system, you have to go to Parliament and have some legal battles.
"In the interim, we are trying to shift the current system and ensure that we reduce the losses and make it a bit more transparent, but ultimately, we want to replace it.”
His comments add to the growing concerns about the viability and transparency of the Gold-for-Oil initiative.
Latest Stories
-
NCD Alliance Ghana urges government to accelerate action on NCDs and mental health
4 seconds -
IEA rejects five-year presidential and parliamentary terms proposed in Ghana constitutional review
1 minute -
Lionel Richie hospitalised after St. Louis concert as doctors conduct cardiac tests
2 minutes -
AG’s office dismisses Atta Akyea’s criticism over absence from Signals Bureau case
7 minutes -
Check out IEA’s 18-point position on key Constitutional review proposals
9 minutes -
Chief Justice removal process open to political manipulation – IEA warns
11 minutes -
Bawumia’s presidency is not an Islamic project – Mustapha Hamid
14 minutes -
Takoradi goes ‘All Out’ as Guinness Ghana DJ Awards nationwide tour ignites Western region
15 minutes -
EU and Nato vow to step up pressure on Russia after ‘new escalation’ in Germany
15 minutes -
Mr David Boa Essilfie
21 minutes -
GoldBod, the microphone and the media’s duty beyond ‘He said’ and ‘She said’
22 minutes -
Shamima Muslim Writes: The honour and duty of representation
25 minutes -
Traders Advocacy Group calls for removal of Transport Minister over port charges, fares
26 minutes -
IEA opposes system allowing President to choose principal advisers on Council of State
31 minutes -
IEA backs lifestyle audits and reverse burden of proof for public officials
33 minutes