Audio By Carbonatix
Former First Deputy Speaker of Parliament, Joseph Osei-Owusu, has stated that facilitating the work of parliament financially to enable its members carry out their work should not be considered corruption.
He said in most cases, budgets for parliamentary work so delay that if committees were to await the releases before getting work done, nothing may be done at the end of the day, which may also disadvantage people seeking public services.
He therefore dismissed suggestions that money paid by the Executive to members of Parliament's Appointments Committee after they vet nominees, constitute bribery and corruption.
He explained that Members of Parliament require funds to fuel their vehicles and cover other expenses to be present in the chamber or at committee sittings to perform their duties. Therefore, if there is ever a shortfall in funding from Parliament’s administration, external support is acceptable to help them carry out their work.
He said, “When committees need to work on reports for agencies, and Parliament has no funds, why should I use my own vehicle and fuel to carry out the work of the agency? Either you facilitate this, or you wait until Parliament is able to release money. If this is what you call corruption, then you clearly misunderstand what it means to work for the government.”
Mr Osei-Owusu was speaking on the Super Morning Show on Joy FM on Thursday, January 30, while discussing allegations of bribery against parliamentarians.
The former Bekwai MP also revealed that, during his time in Parliament, the Chief of Staff ever provided them facilitation after completing certain duties.
Read also: Chief of Staff gave us money after vetting, but it’s not bribery’ – Joseph Osei-Owusu
His comments follow an allegation made by a youth activist Oliver Barker-Vormawor, who claimed that members of Parliament’s Appointment Committee were accepting money from ministerial nominees before approving them after their vetting.
Although Mr. Barker-Vormawor later appeared before Parliament to apologise and retract the allegation, the issue has remained on the front burner, sparking public debate over whether it is acceptable for Members of Parliament to receive money for performing their duties, aside from their official salaries and allowances.
Listen to Joe Osei-Owusu argue his point in the video below. Private legal practitioners Samson Lardy Anyenini and Martin Kpebu, who were part of the discussion, rejected Osei-Owusu's position.
Read also: Bribery allegations are nothing new, but no proof exists’ – Deputy Minority Leader
Latest Stories
-
US teen drops lawsuit against Meta, Google and Snap ahead of trial
45 minutes -
Meghan could return to acting once back in UK
55 minutes -
Bali jails Swiss tourist for insulting sacred Day of Silence
1 hour -
At least 50 killed, mostly children, as overloaded boat capsizes in Nigeria
1 hour -
Nii Lante Vanderpuye apologises to Sammy Gyamfi, NDC over GoldBod comments
4 hours -
US sanctions more Cuban companies and officials
4 hours -
There is something different this time – Dr Yamson hails Mahama govt’s economic management
4 hours -
Gold for Reserves has risky, but necessary – Dr Yamson backs Mahama govt’s gold strategy
4 hours -
‘You want the trade, but not the people?’ – Dr Yamson tears into South Africa’s xenophobia
5 hours -
Walmart sales under strain as US shoppers pull back
5 hours -
The Premier League’s new plan to end corner chaos
5 hours -
US Open offers biggest prize fund in Grand Slam history
5 hours -
‘I feel I am imprisoning myself’ – Djokovic on drive & doubts
6 hours -
India’s Gen Z are driving up a mega boom in its beauty market
6 hours -
Ronaldinho seeks 300th goal with comeback aged 46
6 hours