A new report released by ActionAid Ghana in partnership with Public Services International and Education International has confirmed concerns raised by experts in the finance and tax industry on the alarming debt crisis.

The report is in line with ActionAid Ghana’s Mission Priority four which focuses on how to improve citizen’s participation, public accountability, effective revenue mobilisation and fair redistribution of public resource towards gender- responsive public services.

Titled “The Public Versus Austerity: The wage bill constraints”, the report analyses trends in public sector wage bill in education and health sectors and freezing or depreciation of wages, and trends of the overall public sector wage bill as a percentage of government budget, revenue or GDP. It also examines the links between Ghana’s debt servicing and public sector wage bill and how these are related to the advice of the IMF – under the public sector wage rationalisation policy to contain and reduce the wage bill.

According to the report, although Ghana’s public-sector wage bill has increased significantly over the last decade or so, the pace of growth has not matched the increasing need for the critical workforce required in the public sector, especially in education and health, thus, severely affecting the delivery of quality public services.

The report further reveals that the inability of government to absorb more public-sector workers stems from the growing rigidities in the budget as a result of sharp increases in debt service, in particular interest payments.

Public Debt Servicing

The report revealed that Ghana is spending 59% of its revenue in debt servicing, making the country the second highest in the world. These statistics which are analysed data from the Ministry of Finance between 2016 and 2020 suggests an increasing public debt as against declining GDP growth.

It further revealed that the percentage of government revenue being spent on debt servicing (above 40% between 2016 and 2019 and over 55% in 2020), far exceeds the IMF’s sustainable threshold of 12% and the 18% IMF’s country-specific limit for Ghana. This alarming situation has constricted government’s fiscal space in providing and expanding gender-responsive public social services such as education, health, social protection, water, and sanitation – further deepening the already existing gender inequality and women’s unpaid domestic services.

The report indicated that on average, between 2016 and 2020, over 40 per cent of government’s domestic expenditure and 26% of its total expenditure were in debt service alone. This is 1.74 times (17%) and 1.6 times (16%) higher than the shares of domestic expenditure and total expenditure in both public education and health wage bills. The situation as it stands now is not healthy for Ghana’s economic development as it hampers its efforts in achieving majority of the SDGs.

The report further indicates that the amount spent by the government on public sector wage (including health, education, social protection, security services, sanitation, public works, administration etc.) is almost the same as the amount spent on interest payments on debts. Compared to its peers, Ghana has one of the lowest compensations for workers to expenditure ratio (35.6%) in 2019 but shows the highest percentage of interest payments over total expenditure (31.7%) in the same period.

The report observed that the fast-rising public debt and debt servicing costs have also constrained government’s fiscal space to expand employment in health and education sectors- indicating a “deprioritisation of public services in favor of debt servicing”

IMF Austerity Policies

The report also revealed that as part of the IMF sponsored fiscal consolidation programme launched in 2015, the government accepted the key programme conditionality of public sector wage rationalisation policy to contain and reduce the wage bill.

The conditionalities according to the analyses included the government implementing a hiring freeze across most government agencies, and the cap on nominal wage increases.

The health and education sectors experienced much severer control with respect to hiring. For instance, healthcare or educational institution cannot hire without financial clearance from the Ministry of Finance and the relevant ministry.

For instance, the average national teacher-student ratios are 32:1, 31:1, 15:1, 20:1 and 27:1 for pre-primary, primary, junior high, secondary, and tertiary levels of education, respectively. This is way above the 15:1 global threshold for pre-primary, primary and junior high levels, 13:1 for senior high level and even lower ratio for tertiary (less 13:1 ratio).

The current arrangement means that Ghana’s ratios are twice higher than the economically efficient levels, a situation which affects productivity and delivery of quality education. A look at the gap suggests that to attain the goal of universal primary education or the SDG 4 by 2030, Ghana will need to recruit about 15 per cent more teachers each year at the primary level between now and 2030.

In relation to healthcare, the average doctor-to-population ratio of 1:8132 per population far exceeds the WHO’s global threshold of 1:1000. “We found that Ghana needs to fill a net budgetary deficit of 40″ (US$206.6 million) to meet the minimum requirement of staffing for primary and secondary health services.”

The report further noted that “the COVID-19 crisis has revealed the extent to which public services have been under-funded for a generation across Africa, with women in the poorest communities often having to take the strain to fill the gaps through unpaid care and domestic work”.

It indicated that the contraction in public services is adversely impacting women the more as they form majority of the frontline workers such as teachers, nurses, midwives, doctors and other education and health workers. These, coupled with the increasing women’s unpaid domestic and childcare services, are pushing women more into poverty and undermining the progress on human rights – a situation that significantly threatens the realisation of the Sustainable Development Goals.

Role of IMF and Government

The underfunding of these critical services is in contravention of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), ratified by 171 UN member states including Ghana. The ICESCR requires that, governments must devote their “maximum available resources” (Art 2(1)) to progressively achieve the full realisation of socioeconomic rights for all (Center for Economic and Social Rights, 2020).

To fully mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and secondly, to avert the public sector wage bill caps/freezes on gender responsive public services provision, it is rerecommended that the IMF should move away from policy advice that gives absolute primacy to short-run macro-stability but rather what help the country move towards long-term planning so that they can factor in the returns to longer-run investments in education, health, social protection and sanitation programmes.

ActionAid also recommends that the Government should as part of its long-term planning, determine staffing and pay levels that are consistent with their public sector wage bills and allow for the operation of a motivated and professional teaching force on a sustainable basis.

We also urged the Government to renegotiate with development partners (IMF and World Bank in particular) for a mechanism that ensures that debt servicing does not surpass 18% of government revenue.

The government is also so encouraged to develop policies which support the goals of SDGs and International Labour Organisation’s decent work agenda, which involve decent job creation, rights at work, social protection and social dialogue with gender equality as a crosscutting objective. 

ActionAid is calling on the government to perform a human rights and gender impact assessment of any policy that impacts on the public sector workforce, particularly education, health, social protection, water and sanitation.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.