Audio By Carbonatix
Representatives of Anas Aremeyaw Anas say the investigative journalist may choose to testify as prosecution witness after the Supreme Court quashed a High Court order to have him testify in-camera in the case, Republic vs Kwesi Nyantakyi.
In a statement published on his Twitter page on Tuesday, reacting to the Supreme Court ruling, Cromwell Gray LLP, legal firm of the Tiger Eye Pi CEO said, "Anas Aremeyaw Anas agreed to testify in the stead of Ahmed Suale on the condition he will be allowed to do so in-camera or in chambers."
The statement added that "Anas may choose to testify as prosecution witness or not.
"Anas and his Tiger Eye Pi team will continue to wear the iconic face beads as a symbol of impartial anonymity in investigative journalism and to highlight the extreme risk in that line of duty."
They explained that "the Star witness for the Republic, Ahmed Suale, who was one of the investigative journalists in respect of the documentary, was murdered in Madina, Accra weeks before his testimony could be taken."
The ruling from the Supreme Court presided over by Justice Baffoe-Bonnie granted an application for certiorari filed by Kwesi Nyantakyi quashing the order of High Court 2, Criminal Division, Accra granting a dispensation to Anas Aremeyaw Anas to testify in camera as a prosecution witness in the criminal case entitled Republic v Kwesi Nyantakyi & Another.
They argued that the premiere of the ‘Number 12’ documentary was done in the open without any security concerns, so why would a hearing in court with full security be done in camera and not in an open court?
“Tiger Eye PI and its CEO, Anas Aremeyaw Anas went public with the video documentary because it was in the public interest and should have his testimony in open court, too. The public has an interest in his testimony,” they said.
Following Justice Baffoe-Bonnie's ruling, reports suggested that testifying in open court like any other citizen appearing in court for any hearing means Anas cannot come to court in mask of face beads.
But, his legal team insists the reports are false and should be disregarded.
"The public should disregard fake reportage that has been ordered by the Supreme Court or is being compelled by the Supreme Court to appear in court without his trademark face beads."
Nyantakyi was arraigned before court on March 4, 2020.
Latest Stories
-
42-year-old man jailed 10 years for defiling 7-year-old boy in Wa
10 minutes -
T-bills: Government exceeds target by 30%; interest rates decline again
32 minutes -
Man jailed 10 years for defiling seven-year-old boy in Wa
43 minutes -
NSMQ 2026 : Boa Amponsem SHTS makes light work of rivals to reach nationals
1 hour -
ORAL is still working and prosecuting corruption cases – Deputy AG
1 hour -
Deputy AG alleges ‘deliberate campaign’ to misrepresent Adu-Boahene prosecution
2 hours -
NSMQ 2026: Holy Child School returns to nationals after defeating Mankessim SHTS in tie-breaker
2 hours -
The Circular economy: The missing layer in Ghana’s flood prevention strategy
2 hours -
Miracles Aboagye GH¢55m probe: NPP activist accuses Deputy AG of misleading public
2 hours -
Abla Gomashie secures $3.5m Korean support for Ghana’s heritage
2 hours -
Man jailed 20 years for incest involving 17-year-old daughter in Upper West
2 hours -
Parliament cannot transfer Attorney-General’s prosecutorial powers through legislation – Deputy AG
3 hours -
Glasgow 2026: Amadu Mohammed targets medal after opening victory
3 hours -
Constitution must be amended to create independent prosecutorial authority – Deputy AG
3 hours -
High Court right to rule OSP Act cannot override Constitution – Dr Srem-Sai
3 hours