
Audio By Carbonatix
Representatives of Anas Aremeyaw Anas say the investigative journalist may choose to testify as prosecution witness after the Supreme Court quashed a High Court order to have him testify in-camera in the case, Republic vs Kwesi Nyantakyi.
In a statement published on his Twitter page on Tuesday, reacting to the Supreme Court ruling, Cromwell Gray LLP, legal firm of the Tiger Eye Pi CEO said, "Anas Aremeyaw Anas agreed to testify in the stead of Ahmed Suale on the condition he will be allowed to do so in-camera or in chambers."
The statement added that "Anas may choose to testify as prosecution witness or not.
"Anas and his Tiger Eye Pi team will continue to wear the iconic face beads as a symbol of impartial anonymity in investigative journalism and to highlight the extreme risk in that line of duty."
They explained that "the Star witness for the Republic, Ahmed Suale, who was one of the investigative journalists in respect of the documentary, was murdered in Madina, Accra weeks before his testimony could be taken."
The ruling from the Supreme Court presided over by Justice Baffoe-Bonnie granted an application for certiorari filed by Kwesi Nyantakyi quashing the order of High Court 2, Criminal Division, Accra granting a dispensation to Anas Aremeyaw Anas to testify in camera as a prosecution witness in the criminal case entitled Republic v Kwesi Nyantakyi & Another.
They argued that the premiere of the ‘Number 12’ documentary was done in the open without any security concerns, so why would a hearing in court with full security be done in camera and not in an open court?
“Tiger Eye PI and its CEO, Anas Aremeyaw Anas went public with the video documentary because it was in the public interest and should have his testimony in open court, too. The public has an interest in his testimony,” they said.
Following Justice Baffoe-Bonnie's ruling, reports suggested that testifying in open court like any other citizen appearing in court for any hearing means Anas cannot come to court in mask of face beads.
But, his legal team insists the reports are false and should be disregarded.
"The public should disregard fake reportage that has been ordered by the Supreme Court or is being compelled by the Supreme Court to appear in court without his trademark face beads."
Nyantakyi was arraigned before court on March 4, 2020.
Latest Stories
-
JICA reaffirms support for Ghana’s 24-Hour Economy and industrial transformation
5 seconds -
EOCO warns of emerging ‘Model Q’ criminal network driving trafficking and financial fraud across West Africa
4 minutes -
Students Loan Trust Fund urges applicants to complete loan process before July 15
12 minutes -
Can pan-Africanism survive Africa’s democratic challenges?
18 minutes -
Judiciary must embrace technology, reforms — Prof Bondzi-Simpson
33 minutes -
Cyber Security Authority warns of online investment scams as victims lose GH¢3.4m in six months
47 minutes -
Pharmaceutical Society backs 24-Hour Economy, seeks security and tax relief for pharmacies
56 minutes -
God or Prophet? – Queen Liz explores the identity of Jesus Christ
1 hour -
Ukraine warns of interceptor missile shortage as 18 killed in Kyiv region
1 hour -
Barker-Vormawor asks court to compel Attorney-General to disclose whereabouts of “Abu Trica”
1 hour -
Political communication in Ghana: Are we informing citizens or winning arguments?
1 hour -
Accra court remands man over alleged GH¢114,000 fraud in travel visa scheme
1 hour -
Police investigate death of young woman found hanging in Anyinamso bush
1 hour -
Africa’s future would have to be shaped by African solutions – World Food Prize Foundation President
1 hour -
Showbiz and sports personalities urged to protect their intellectual property
1 hour