Audio By Carbonatix
It’s a universal truth that battery life on phones is bad.
Even with the giant batteries and external battery packs, we tote around, most modern smartphones struggle to make it through a full day of use, while the best devices barely scrape through two.
But it didn’t use to be this way: back in the (relatively) old days, phones had (relatively) fantastic battery life, lasting for multiple days at a time without needing to be charged. And, yes, our phones today are vastly more powerful than, say, a Nokia 3310, but why haven’t batteries kept up with the pace of progress?
According to Venkat Srinivasan, director of the Argonne Collaborative Center for Energy Storage Science and an expert in battery technology, the core of the issue is simple: Moore’s Law has simply outpaced battery technology, meaning that our phones have gotten better — and demanded more power — at a much faster rate than advancements in batteries have.
It’s not that there haven’t been any improvements: we’ve been able to steadily increase energy density over the past few years by shrinking down internal components. But according to Srinivasan, “Five years ago, it became clear we couldn’t remove any more things, there were fires. We’ve reached a stage where new improvements in energy density are going to come from changing battery materials, and new materials are always slower compared to what I would call engineering advances.”
That’s because today’s rechargeable batteries in phones are based on lithium cobalt, a battery technology we’ve been using since the early ‘90s, and we’ve largely reached the limit of how much power we can squeeze out of it. There is hope for the future. Researchers are already investigating new battery technology, like solid-state batteries, that could open the door to more energy-dense materials that could offer more power for future devices.
There is a catch, though: by the time those new batteries roll around, our phones may be even more advanced and need even more power, which could leave us right back with the same, one-day battery life that we started with.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Tags:
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Latest Stories
-
Muslim women charged to champion nation-building, moral upbringing and combat drug abuse
47 minutes -
‘Lifestyle with Rossie’ set to redefine Saturday television on Joy Prime
1 hour -
WASSCE Poor Results: Grading system cannot be blamed – Prof Stephen Adei
2 hours -
Ghana’s prisons: A national issue we can’t ignore
2 hours -
Prince George set for first day at Eton College
2 hours -
Trump threatens to stop sale of Canadian Bombardier jets in US
2 hours -
Flight recorders recovered from ‘devastating’ Amazon cargo plane crash
4 hours -
AI cancer cures slowed by chip shortage, says UK’s biggest tech boss
4 hours -
Grindr to pay £26m to settle claims it allegedly shared users’ HIV status
4 hours -
China to pump $54bn into state banks and insurers to boost economy
4 hours -
Legal Green Association to hold maiden law students’ conference
4 hours -
Dolly Parton’s sister pleads for end to ‘AI garbage’ posts after singer’s death
5 hours -
Minority calls for itemised bill on GH¢49.7 million South Africa evacuation expenditure
5 hours -
Australians will be able to switch off social media algorithms under planned legislation
5 hours -
WAEC admits more study needed into fluctuating core subject performance
5 hours