Audio By Carbonatix
Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, has reversed his decision after initially ordering that Parliament retain the name of James Gyakye Quayson in its records.
The Speaker expressed uncertainty regarding the clarity of the Court's order and believed that Parliament as a whole should make a collective decision on the matter.
This was after the Supreme Court recently made public the full reasoning behind its decision to declare the Assin North MP's victory unconstitutional.
On May 17, the apex court ruled that Mr Quayson should be expunged from Parliament's records as a Member of Parliament.
But speaking in the House on Thursday, Mr Bagbin explained that "the order did not say the Speaker should expunge [Gyakye Qyayson]."
"It did not say any Member of Parliament or Clerk should expunge [the name], it says the institution called Parliament. So that institution must carry out the order. The only way the institution can carry out the order is for the institution to reason together. And that is only done in a sitting where the opportunity is given to members to think through it," he told the Parliamentarians.
In the May 17 ruling, Presiding Judge Justice Jones Dotse stated that the Electoral Commission (EC) had acted unconstitutionally by allowing Quayson to contest the 2020 parliamentary elections without providing proof of renouncing his Canadian citizenship.
The case was brought forward by Michael Ankomah Nimfah, a resident of the constituency.
Nimfah argued that Quayson, at the time of filing his nomination form in October 2020, was not eligible to contest as a member of Parliament for the Assin North Constituency.
Following the court's ruling, the Clerk of Parliament wrote to the Electoral Commission (EC) declaring the Assin North seat vacant, leading to the scheduling of a by-election for June 27.
However, Speaker Alban Bagbin now supports the idea of retaining Quayson's name in Parliament's records.
He has taken this path because he does not "want to assume powers that are not clearly spelt out in any law."
"So I did indicate and mentioned to some members of the Supreme Court that there is a need for clarification,” he explained.
Latest Stories
-
Ablakwa: Ghana’s Embassies, High Commissions to support World Assemblies of God Congress
2 minutes -
Joyce Bawah Mogtari cites infrastructure, healthcare reforms as evidence of Mahama’s development agenda
3 minutes -
Ghana had no single gadget to detect narcotics when we took office – Muntaka
9 minutes -
GES to consult stakeholders on academic calendar adjustments
17 minutes -
Mahama reaffirms commitment to equitable development across Ghana
17 minutes -
Youth employment must remain central to Ghana’s economic reset – Joyce Bawah Mogtari
19 minutes -
Ethnic conflicts, land disputes and illicit drugs remain major security concerns – Muntaka
25 minutes -
Mahama Ayariga visits Kumasi Central Market fire scene to assess damage
29 minutes -
Ghana has 48 legitimate entry points but over 300 illegal crossing points – Interior Minister
42 minutes -
Ghana is much safer now than in 2025 – Muntaka
58 minutes -
Bawku has gone 150 days without gunfire – Interior Minister
1 hour -
It still surprises me GAUA is on strike after signing MoU – Fair Wages CEO
1 hour -
Kumasi Hospital removes 880-gram bladder stone in rare surgical case
1 hour -
Ghana lacks sufficient power generation redundancy – Energy Minister
2 hours -
CPA assures consumers of safety of registered sanitary towels on the Ghanaian market after complaints
2 hours