The Ghana Journalists Association (GJA) has questioned a High Court ruling granting a permanent injunction restraining a journalist from publishing investigative findings.

The Association described the ruling as a “dagger” to press freedom.

The judgment was delivered on November 7, 2025, by the High Court (Human Rights Division) in the case of Ms Cynthia Adjei v Mr Innocent Samuel Appiah and the Attorney General.

The case arose from a human rights enforcement action filed by a private businesswoman, Ms Adjei, against investigative journalist Mr Appiah.

Ms Adjei contended that Mr Appiah, through WhatsApp messages and letters, sought detailed information about her businesses, collectively known as the Lysaro Group.

The inquiries related to the alleged non-renewal of company documents, tax compliance, conflict of interest concerns in procurement contracts at GOIL, and the acquisition of government lands.

In his defence, Mr Appiah said he was conducting standard investigative journalism on matters of public interest.

He explained that his communications followed ethical protocol to allow the subject to respond before publication, noting that no story had been published at the time the lawsuit was filed.
Franko Trading Price Drop

The Court ruled in favour of Ms Adjei, finding that seeking information for publication violated her right to privacy under Article 18(2) of the Constitution.

It granted a perpetual injunction preventing the journalist from publishing any information about her and awarded costs against him, but denied her claim for damages.

The GJA President, Mr Albert Dwumfour, warned that the ruling threatened the media’s watchdog role.

“The recent ruling by the High Court sends a chilling message to every journalist in this country,” he said.

“Press freedom is not a gift from the state; it is a fundamental right guaranteed by our Constitution that we must defend at all costs,” he added at the 3rd GJA Dinner Night in Accra.

Mr Dwumfour emphasised that the Association would challenge legal actions that undermine journalists’ rights.

He called on the judiciary to strike a balance between protecting individual reputations and safeguarding the public’s right to know in a democracy.