Researcher at the Faculty of Law of the University of Cambridge, Oliver Barker-Vormawor, says avenues must be created to involve citizens in the law-making process.
Speaking on Joy News’ The Law on Sunday, he explained that when people are allowed to partake in the process actively, it will prevent democracy take over by institutions.
He added that a law-making process devoid of the people's energies without political alignments doesn’t bring about improvement in democracy since it leaves behind the best intellectual brains.
According to him, the Constitution does not allow for a popular initiative, thus; allowing people to make suggestions on reviewing or amending a part of it.
“We’ve cut out the people from the law-making process itself because we say it a representative government, meaning that even if you want to do a petition to Parliament, you can’t do it. Parliament will now write back to you and say that is not the proper way.
"The proper way to do it by what they mean so that a Member of Parliament must take it and lay it on the table and move it as their own motion. So it’s not a people’s thing,” he said.
The Legal practitioner said another way the people can be added to the law-making process is by creating a legislative hearing like the US.
“We’ve now have introduced a sort of memoranda which we can submerge, but we have to have all those hearings, and it is required that you must meet all those groups in the ways in which people come before them and defend these ideas...before any law is passed. So that brings the people again into the process,” he said.
He further stated that a recalled election where persons dissatisfied with a government could gather votes and demand a by-election also allows citizens into the law-making process.
The #FixTheCountry Convenor noted the group is calling for a complete overhaul of the constitution because they want a constitution that thrives in a system of checks and balances, adding that they want a limited government (an executive that is checked).
“If we are also benching the entirety of our constitution on a particular set of arrangements where certain institutions check each other and the way in which the politicians have subverted that process is to make sure that you subvert the institutions themselves so one of the gambles we make is that Parliament will check the Executive and then Judiciary will check both of them. But a lot of times, we talk about ‘you scratch my back, I scratch your back.”
Latest Stories
-
I commend PURC for taking courageous step to fine ECG board members – Kwame Pianim
12 mins -
Financing assurance secured from bilateral creditors to aid 2nd review funding for Ghana – IMF Africa head
43 mins -
Man who set himself on fire outside Trump’s Manhattan hush money trial dies
58 mins -
Fuel purchase issues have nothing to do with personal interest – Egypa Mercer
1 hour -
ISRQ2024: Theorose School wins Championship with 0.5 points, heads to Canada
1 hour -
Use your voice, talents, skills to advocate for positive change – UniMAC VC tells graduates
1 hour -
Livestream: Newsfile discusses ‘dumsor’, Ex-MASLOC CEO jail and Election 2024
1 hour -
Otumfuo STEM Festival launched to find problem-solvers, promote science education
2 hours -
Irene Logan ties the knot in colourful ceremony
2 hours -
Alliance with other parties, not a merger – Alan Kyerematen
2 hours -
Ghana’s Mohammed Fuseini scores in Randers 2-2 draw Odense BK
2 hours -
We are behind schedule on flood control programme – Oppong Nkrumah
2 hours -
Jennifer Kankam scores five against Tala’ea El Gaish in ZED FC’s big win in Egyptian league
3 hours -
You won’t start at Hearts of Oak – Charles Taylor tells Erling Haaland
3 hours -
People have lost patriotism, passion for the nation – Sulemana Braimah
3 hours