Audio By Carbonatix
Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin has announced an indefinite boycott of parliamentary proceedings in protest against Speaker Alban Bagbin's decision to declare four seats vacant.
This follows a ruling that affects MPs Cynthia Morrison (Agona West), Kwadjo Asante (Suhum), Peter Kwakye Ackah (Amenfi Central), and Andrew Asiamah (Fomena), who either opted to contest the 2024 elections as independent candidates or switched party allegiances.
Speaker Bagbin’s decision is rooted in constitutional provisions that mandate MPs to vacate their seats if they switch parties or contest as independents while still serving as sitting members of Parliament.
The ruling has significant implications for the balance of power in Parliament, leaving the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC) with 136 seats, compared to the NPP’s 135, effectively making the NDC the majority caucus.
Following the announcement, a frustrated Afenyo-Markin led NPP MPs in a walkout from Parliament.
He expressed his dissatisfaction with the Speaker’s ruling, accusing Bagbin of aligning with the NDC and failing to follow the appropriate legal processes.
Mr Afenyo-Markin had previously filed a legal challenge with the Supreme Court on Tuesday, October 15, seeking to halt the Minority’s petition and clarify the legal status of the MPs involved.
In his remarks to the media after the walkout, Afenyo-Markin criticised the Speaker for what he described as a politically biased decision.
He reiterated the NPP’s commitment to the rule of law but warned that the party would not tolerate actions that undermine fairness and legal procedures.
Despite the boycott, the NPP remains focused on resolving the legal challenges surrounding the vacant seats, emphasising the importance of adhering to due process in addressing constitutional issues related to parliamentary representation.
“We as the Majority caucus immediately are boycotting parliament until this matter is determined by the Supreme Court. The speaker has no right to interpret the constitution, and it is so clear that what he did was to give an advantage to the NDC and do the bidding of the NDC."
“We are not going further to litigate. We have a process at the court, we will follow it up. If the court makes a pronouncement we will respect the orders of the court," he told the media.
Latest Stories
-
Lebanon parliament votes to abolish death penalty
11 minutes -
The rise of AI in the classroom: Balancing technological innovation with critical thinking
39 minutes -
Five arrested over alleged MoMo robbery syndicate in Upper West
44 minutes -
UEW journalism students call for practical media studio
47 minutes -
Beyond certification: How Bawaa the artist is helping young creatives turn talent into opportunity
55 minutes -
The Law 101: Vacation warrants and the role of the CJ (Part IV)
1 hour -
The Law 101: GBA states pure law and convention about Legal Vacation (Part III)
1 hour -
Pray – THE LAW 101: The Vacation Roster dilemma and the reality of Court Recess (Part II)
2 hours -
Trump hid in catering truck in secret plane swap over Iran threat, reports say
2 hours -
Inside the Secret Service ‘shell game’ to hide US presidents in plain sight
2 hours -
GEA seeks Gender Ministry’s support for Female Future Programme
2 hours -
Driver beaten to death over misunderstanding at Gomoa Achiase
2 hours -
Bagre Dam spillage: 68 communities in Northern region alerted as Burkina Faso monitors water levels
2 hours -
ECG announces power outages in Central, Eastern and Western Regions on Thursday
2 hours -
THE LAW 101: Tempus Non Currit – Why the sacred silence of the Legal Vacation protects justice (Part I)
3 hours