Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

The New Patriotic Party (NPP) has condemned the one-year prison sentence handed to TikToker Camilla Alhassan, describing it as a troubling signal of growing intolerance and a criminalisation of free expression under President John Dramani Mahama’s administration.

The Accra Circuit Court on Thursday, July 16, 2026, convicted the 43-year-old content creator on charges of offensive conduct after she pleaded guilty to publishing videos alleging, without evidence, that President Mahama had buried 32 cows as part of ritual sacrifices to secure victory in the 2024 general election. The court struck out a separate charge of electronic abuse, ruling it lacked jurisdiction to hear that aspect of the case.

In a press statement, the opposition party said the imprisonment of a citizen over expressive conduct raises profound constitutional questions regarding the freedom of speech guaranteed under Article 21 of the 1992 Constitution.

"The imprisonment of a citizen over expressive conduct raises profound constitutional questions regarding the freedom of speech guaranteed under Article 21 of the 1992 Constitution," the NPP said in its statement. "No amount of legal formalism can conceal the fact that a Ghanaian has today been deprived of her liberty in circumstances arising from her expression. This is not the hallmark of a confident democracy."

The party called the sentence a "troubling signal of growing intolerance" and argued that if the President feels defamed, the Constitution points him to a courtroom, not a prison cell.

"If any person, including the President of the Republic, believes that he has been defamed, our legal system provides a clear, civilised and well-established remedy: an action in civil defamation," the party said. "What we have witnessed instead is the deployment of the coercive machinery of the State, including the Police, the Attorney General and the criminal courts to punish an ordinary citizen."

The NPP also condemned the treatment of Madam Alhassan, describing scenes at the court premises where she was "paraded and handled as though she were a dangerous violent offender" as an affront to human dignity.

The case has reignited debate over the use of laws to police online expression. The Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA) has documented 14 arrests linked to false news and offensive speech in the 16 months since President Mahama took office, nearly double the number recorded during the entire eight-year tenure of the previous administration.

The MFWA has expressed deep concern over what it describes as the increasing "weaponisation" of laws, including Section 76 of the Electronic Communications Act and Sections 207 and 208 of the Criminal Offences Act, to arrest and prosecute people for comments made in public and on social media.

The NPP has additionally petitioned the diplomatic community, calling on them to take note of the developments and support democratic values. The party has also served notice that it will support every lawful effort to pursue an immediate appeal against the conviction and sentence.

Meanwhile, the government has defended the enforcement action, maintaining it is not a crackdown but a necessary response to the explosion of reckless and dangerous content on social media. Communications Minister Samuel Nartey George recently declared that while free speech is a pillar of governance, the state would not shield the "weaponisation of fake news".

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.